Publication

Antigenic competition in CD4(+) T cell responses in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical HIV vaccine trial

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Esper G. Kallas, University of Sao PauloNicole A. Grunenberg, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterChenchen Yu, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterBryce Manso, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterGiuseppe Pantaleo, Lausanne University HospitalMartin Casapia, Asociación Civil Selva AmazónicaLindsey R. Baden, Harvard UniversityJavier Valencia, Asociación Civil Selva AmazónicaMagdalena Sobieszczyk, Columbia UniversityVan Tieu Hong, New York Blood CenterMary Allen, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious DiseasesJohn Hural, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterBarney S. Graham, National Institutes of HealthJames Kublin, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterPeter B. Gilbert, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterLawrence Corey, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterPaul A. Goepfert, University of Alabama BirminghamM. Juliana McElrath, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterRobert Johnson, Emory UniversityYunda Huang, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterNicole Frahm, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-11-20
Publisher
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 The Authors.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 11
Issue
  • 519
Grant/Funding Information
  • UM1 AI069481 [Seattle-Lausanne-Kampala Clinical Trials Unit: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Clinical Research Site], UM1 AI069412 [Harvard/Boston/Providence Clinical Trials Unit: Brigham and Women’s Hospital Clinical Research Site]
  • This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) U.S. Public Health Service Grants UM1 AI068614 [LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials Network], UM1 AI068635 [SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials Network], UM1 AI068618 [LC: HIV Vaccine Trials Network]
  • UM1 AI069470 [Columbia Partnership for Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Unit: College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Blood Center Clinical Research Sites], and P51 OD011132.
  • UM1 AI069438 [IMPACTA Peru Clinical Trials Unit: Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion (IMPACTA) and Asociación Civil Selva Amazonica (ACSA) Clinical Research Sites], UM1 AI069420 [São Paulo Clinical Trials Unit: Centro de Referência e Treinamento DST/AIDS Clinical Research Site]
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • T cell responses have been implicated in reduced risk of HIV acquisition in uninfected persons and control of viral replication in HIV-infected individuals. HIV Gag-specific T cells have been predominantly associated with post-infection control, whereas Env antigens are the target for protective antibodies; therefore, inclusion of both antigens is common in HIV vaccine design. However, inclusion of multiple antigens may provoke antigenic competition, reducing the potential effectiveness of the vaccine. HVTN 084 was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase 1 trial to investigate whether adding Env to a Gag/Pol vaccine decreases the magnitude or breadth of Gag/ Pol-specific T cell responses. Fifty volunteers each received one intramuscular injection of 1 × 1010 particle units (PU) of rAd5 Gag/Pol and EnvA/B/C (3:1:1:1 mixture) or 5 × 109 PU of rAd5 Gag/Pol. CD4+ T cell responses to Gag/ Pol measured 4 weeks after vaccination by cytokine expression were significantly higher in the group vaccinated without Env, whereas CD8+ T cell responses did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mapping of individual epitopes revealed greater breadth of the Gag/Pol-specific T cell response in the absence of Env compared to Env coimmunization. Addition of an Env component to a Gag/Pol vaccine led to reduced Gag/Pol CD4+ T cell response rate and magnitude as well as reduced epitope breadth, confirming the presence of antigenic competition. Therefore, T cell–based vaccine strategies should aim at choosing a minimalist set of antigens to reduce interference of individual vaccine components with the induction of the maximally achievable immune response.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Nicole Frahm, PhD, Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, 245 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, nicole.frahm@gatesmri.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Biology, Cell

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items