Publication

Primary Care Comprehensiveness and Care Coordination in Robust Specialist Networks Results in Lower Emergency Department Utilization: A Network Analysis of Medicaid Physician Networks

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/23/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Zhaowei She, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAnne H. Gaglioti, Morehouse School of MedicinePeter Baltrus, Morehouse School of MedicineChaohua Li, Morehouse School of MedicineMiranda Moore, Emory UniversityLilly Immergluck, Emory UniversityArthi Rao, Georgia Institute of TechnologyTurgay Ayer, Georgia Institute of Technology
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-01-01
Publisher
  • SAGE Publications
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2020.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 11
Start Page
  • 2150132720924432
End Page
  • 2150132720924432
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (Grant No. P20 1P20MD006881-02), and the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (Grant No. U54 8U54MD007588).
Abstract
  • Background: Care coordination is an essential and difficult to measure function of primary care. Objective: Our objective was to assess the impact of network characteristics in primary/specialty physician networks on emergency department (ED) visits for patients with chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). Subjects and Measures: This cross-sectional social network analysis of primary care and specialty physicians caring for adult Medicaid beneficiaries with ACSCs was conducted using 2009 Texas Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) files. Network characteristic measures were the main exposure variables. A negative binomial regression model analyzed the impact of network characteristics on the ED visits per patient in the panel. Results: There were 42 493 ACSC patients assigned to 5687 primary care physicians (PCPs) connected to 11 660 specialist physicians. PCPs whose continuity patients did not visit a specialist had 86% fewer ED visits per patient in their panel, compared with PCPs whose patients saw specialists. Among PCPs connected to specialists in the network, those with a higher number of specialist collaborators and those with a high degree of centrality had lower patient panel ED rates. Conclusions: PCPs providing comprehensive care (ie, without specialist consultation) for their patients with chronic ACSCs had lower ED utilization rates than those coordinating care with specialists. PCPs with robust specialty networks and a high degree of centrality in the network also had lower ED utilization. The right fit between comprehensiveness of primary care, care coordination, and adequate capacity of specialty availability in physician networks is needed to drive outcomes.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Anne H. Gaglioti, National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview Drive, SW, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA. Email: agaglioti@msm.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Sociology, Social Structure and Development
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items