Publication

Trimodality Therapy in the Treatment of Stage III N2-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    M Behera, Emory UniversityConor Steuer, Emory UniversityYuan Liu, Emory UniversityFelix Fernandez, Emory UniversityC Fu, Emory UniversityKristin Higgins, Emory UniversityTheresa Gillespie, Emory UniversitySuchita Pakkala, Emory UniversityRathi Pillai, Emory UniversitySeth Force, Emory UniversityCP Belani, Penn UnivFadlo Khuri, Emory UniversityWalter Curran Jr, Emory UniversitySuresh Ramalingam, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-01-14
Publisher
  • Wiley
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © AlphaMed Press 2020.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 25
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • E964
End Page
  • E975
Grant/Funding Information
  • Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics & Bioinformatics and Winship Research Informatics Shared Resources of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/National Cancer Institute under award numbers P30CA138292 and P50CA217691.
Abstract
  • Background Significant controversy remains regarding the care of patients with clinical stage III (N2‐positive) NSCLC. Although multimodality therapy is effective, the roles of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are not fully defined and the optimal treatment approach is not firmly established. We analyzed outcomes and predictors associated with trimodality therapy (TT) in the National Cancer Database. Materials and Methods The NCDB was queried from 2004 to 2014 for patients with NSCLC diagnosed with stage III (N2) disease and treated with chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). Three cohorts of patients were studied: CRT only/no surgery (NS), CRT plus lobectomy (LT), and CRT plus pneumonectomy (PT). The univariate and multivariable analyses (MVA) were conducted using Cox proportional hazards model and log‐rank tests. Results A total of 29,754 patients were included in this analysis: NS 90.1%, LT 8.4%, and PT 1.5%. Patient characteristics: median age 66 years; male 56% and white 85%. Patients treated at academic centers were more likely to receive TT compared with those treated at community centers (odds ratio: 1.85 [1.53–2.23]; p < .001). On MVA, patients that received TT were associated with better survival than those that received only CRT (hazard ratio: 0.59 [0.55–0.62]; p < .001). The LT group was associated with significantly better survival than the PT and NS groups (median survival: 62.8 months vs. 51.8 months vs. 34.2 months, respectively). In patients with more than two nodes involved, PT was associated with worse survival than LT and NS (median survival: 51.4 months in LT and 39 months in NS vs. 37 months in PT). The 30‐day and 90‐day mortality rates were found to be significantly higher in PT patients than in LT. Conclusion TT was used in less than 10% of patients with stage III N2 disease, suggesting high degree of patient selection. In this selected group, TT was associated with favorable outcomes relative to CRT alone. Implications for Practice This analysis demonstrates that trimodality therapy could benefit a selected subset of patients with stage III (N2) disease. This plan should be considered as a treatment option following patient evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting in experienced medical centers with the needed expertise.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Madhusmita Behera, Ph.D., Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1784 North Decatur Rd., NDB 405, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. Telephone: 404‐778‐2876; e‐mail: mbehera@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy
  • Health Sciences, Radiology
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items