Publication

Artificial intelligence education: An evidence-based medicine approach for consumers, translators, and developers

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/17/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Faye Yu Ci Ng, National University of SingaporeArun James Thirunavukarasu, University of CambridgeHaoran Cheng, Emory UniversityTing Fang Tan, Singapore Health ServiceLaura Gutierrez, Singapore Health ServiceYanyan Lan, Tsinghua UniversityJasmine Chiat Ling Ong, Singapore General HospitalYap Seng Chong, National University of SingaporeKee Yuan Ngiam, National University of SingaporeDean Ho, National University of SingaporeTien Yin Wong, Tsinghua UniversityKenneth Kwek, Singapore General HospitalFinale Doshi-Velez, Harvard UniversityCatherine Lucey, University of California, San FranciscoThomas Coffman, National University of SingaporeDaniel Shu Wei Ting, National University of Singapore
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-10-17
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 The Author(s)
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 4
Issue
  • 10
Start Page
  • 101230
Grant/Funding Information
  • D.S.W.T. is supported by Duke-NUS Medical School (Duke-NUS/RSF/2021/0018 and 05/FY2020/EX/15-A58), the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A20H4g2141 and H20C6a0032), and the National Medical Research Council, Singapore (NMRC/HSRG/0087/2018, MOH-000655-00, and MOH-001014-00).
Abstract
  • Current and future healthcare professionals are generally not trained to cope with the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare. To design a curriculum that caters to variable baseline knowledge and skills, clinicians may be conceptualized as “consumers”, “translators”, or “developers”. The changes required of medical education because of AI innovation are linked to those brought about by evidence-based medicine (EBM). We outline a core curriculum for AI education of future consumers, translators, and developers, emphasizing the links between AI and EBM, with suggestions for how teaching may be integrated into existing curricula. We consider the key barriers to implementation of AI in the medical curriculum: time, resources, variable interest, and knowledge retention. By improving AI literacy rates and fostering a translator- and developer-enriched workforce, innovation may be accelerated for the benefit of patients and practitioners.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Education

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items