Publication

Gene-specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: Recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Jessica L Mester, GeneDx IncRajarshi Ghosh, Baylor College of MedicineTina Pesaran, Ambry GeneticsRobert Huether, Tempus LabsRachid Karam, Ambry GeneticsKathleen S. Hruska, GeneDx IncHelio A. Costa, Stanford UniversityKatherine Lachlan, University of SouthamptonJoanne Ngeow, National Cancer Centre SingaporeJill Barnholtz-Sloan, Case Comprehensive Cancer CentreKaitlin Sesock, Counsyl IncFelicia Hernandez, Ambry GeneticsLiying Zhang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterLaura Milko, University of North CarolinaSharon E. Plon, Baylor College of MedicineMadhuri Hegde, Emory UniversityCharis Eng, Case Comprehensive Cancer Centre
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-11-01
Publisher
  • Wiley: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1059-7794
Volume
  • 39
Issue
  • 11
Start Page
  • 1581
End Page
  • 1592
Grant/Funding Information
  • The ClinGen Consortium is funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health through the following grants and contracts: U41HG006834 (Rehm), U41HG009649 (Bustamante/Plon), U01HG007436 (Bustamante/Plon), U01HG007437 (Berg), and U41HG009650 (Berg).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • The ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel was organized by the ClinGen Hereditary Cancer Clinical Domain Working Group to assemble clinicians, researchers, and molecular diagnosticians with PTEN expertise to develop specifications to the 2015 ACMG/AMP Sequence Variant Interpretation Guidelines for PTEN variant interpretation. We describe finalized PTEN-specific variant classification criteria and outcomes from pilot testing of 42 variants with benign/likely benign (BEN/LBEN), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (PATH/LPATH), uncertain significance (VUS), and conflicting (CONF) ClinVar assertions. Utilizing these rules, classifications concordant with ClinVar assertions were achieved for 14/15 (93.3%) BEN/LBEN and 16/16 (100%) PATH/LPATH ClinVar consensus variants for an overall concordance of 96.8% (30/31). The variant where agreement was not reached was a synonymous variant near a splice donor with noncanonical sequence for which in silico models cannot predict the native site. Applying these rules to six VUS and five CONF variants, adding shared internal laboratory data enabled one VUS to be classified as LBEN and two CONF variants to be as classified as PATH and LPATH. This study highlights the benefit of gene-specific criteria and the value of sharing internal laboratory data for variant interpretation. Our PTEN-specific criteria and expertly reviewed assertions should prove helpful for laboratories and others curating PTEN variants.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Engineering, Biomedical
  • Biology, Genetics
  • Chemistry, Biochemistry

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items