Publication

Short-Time Windows of Correlation Between Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Predict Vigilance Intraindividually and Interindividually

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Garth John Thompson, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMatthew Evan Magnuson, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMichael Donelyn Merritt, Georgia Institute of TechnologyHillary Schwarb, Georgia Institute of TechnologyWenju Pan, Emory UniversityAndrew McKinley, Air Force Research Laboratory, OhioLloyd D. Tripp, Air Force Research Laboratory, OhioEric H. Schumacher, Georgia Institute of TechnologyShella Keilholz, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-12-01
Publisher
  • John Wiley & Sons
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 34
Issue
  • 12
Start Page
  • 3280
End Page
  • 3298
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was performed under an appointment to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Scholarship and Fellowship Program, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and DHS.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • A better understanding of how behavioral performance emerges from interacting brain systems may come from analysis of functional networks using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Recent studies comparing such networks with human behavior have begun to identify these relationships, but few have used a time scale small enough to relate their findings to variation within a single individual's behavior. In the present experiment we examined the relationship between a psychomotor vigilance task and the interacting default mode and task positive networks. Two time-localized comparative metrics were calculated: difference between the two networks' signals at various time points around each instance of the stimulus (peristimulus times) and correlation within a 12.3-s window centered at each peristimulus time. Correlation between networks was also calculated within entire resting-state functional imaging runs from the same individuals. These metrics were compared with response speed on both an intraindividual and an interindividual basis. In most cases, a greater difference or more anticorrelation between networks was significantly related to faster performance. While interindividual analysis showed this result generally, using intraindividual analysis it was isolated to peristimulus times 4 to 8 s before the detected target. Within that peristimulus time span, the effect was stronger for individuals who tended to have faster response times. These results suggest that the relationship between functional networks and behavior can be better understood by using shorter time windows and also by considering both intraindividual and interindividual variability.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Shella Dawn Keilholz, Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, 101 Woodruff Circle WMB 2001, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail: shella.keilholz@bme.gatech.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Neuroscience
  • Engineering, Biomedical
  • Psychology, Psychobiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items