Publication

Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/22/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Anna Comparelli, Sapienza University RomeValentina Corigliano, Department of Psychiatry Roma 1Benedetta Montalbani, Sapienza University RomeAdele Nardella, Department of Psychiatry and Substance AbuseAntonella De Carolis, Sapienza University RomeLorenzo Stampatore, Sapienza University RomeParide Bargagna, Sapienza University RomeFrancesca Forcina, Sapienza University RomeDorian Lamis, Emory UniversityMaurizio Pompili, Sapienza University Rome
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-09-26
Publisher
  • BMC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2022
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 22
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 628
End Page
  • 628
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research received no external funding.
Abstract
  • BACKGROUND: Research on the influence of neurocognitive factors on suicide risk, regardless of the diagnosis, is inconsistent. Recently, suicide risk studies propose applying a trans-diagnostic framework in line with the launch of the Research Domain Criteria Cognitive Systems model. In the present study, we highlight the extent of cognitive impairment using a standardized battery in a psychiatric sample stratified for different degrees of suicidal risk. We also differentiate in our sample various neurocognitive profiles associated with different levels of risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided a sample of 106 subjects into three groups stratified by suicide risk level: Suicide Attempt (SA), Suicidal Ideation (SI), Patient Controls (PC) and Healthy Controls (HC). We conducted a multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) for each cognitive domain measured through the standardized battery MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). RESULTS: We found that the group of patients performed worse than the group of healthy controls on most domains; social cognition was impaired in the suicide risk groups compared both to HC and PC. Patients in the SA group performed worse than those in the SI group. CONCLUSION: Social cognition impairment may play a crucial role in suicidality among individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness as it is involved in both SI and SA; noteworthy, it is more compromised in the SA group fitting as a marker of risk severity.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Behavioral
  • Psychology, Clinical
  • Psychology, Cognitive

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items