Publication

Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Study of Rifalazil Compared with Azithromycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    William M. Geisler, University of AlabamaMaria Luz G. Pascual, RFS PharmaJudy Mathew, RFS PharmaWilliam D. Koltun, Medical Center for Clinical ResearchFranklin Morgan, Tidewater Physicians for WomenByron E. Batteiger, Indiana University School of MedicineAnnette Mayes, Office of Annette MayesSijia Tao, Emory UniversitySelwyn Hurwitz, Emory UniversityChalom Sayada, ActivBiotics PharmaRaymond F Schinazi, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-07-01
Publisher
  • American Society for Microbiology
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014, American Society for Microbiology.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0066-4804
Volume
  • 58
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • 4014
End Page
  • 4019
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by Raymond F. Schinazi and in part by NIH grant 5P30-AI-50409 (to R.F.S.) (CFAR) and by the Department of Veterans Affairs (to R.F.S.).
  • The study was sponsored by ActivBiotics Pharma LLC. Raymond F. Schinazi (RFS) and Chalom Sayada are the founders and major shareholders of ActivBiotics Pharma LLC. R. F.
Abstract
  • A randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose chlamydia therapies of oral rifalazil (25 mg) and azithromycin (1 g) was conducted in 82 women with uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. The microbiologic cure rate of C. trachomatis with rifalazil (n = 33) was 84.8% at the visit on day 22 to 26 (test-of-cure visit), versus 92.1% with azithromycin (n = 38), and the number of treatment failures in each group was 5 and 3, respectively. The difference in cure rate was -7.3%, with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of -22.5, and thus, noninferiority was not established at the prespecified margin (lower limit of CI of -15%). The overall treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and treatment-related TEAE rates were lower in the rifalazil group (68% and 55%) than in the azithromycin group (71% and 62%), respectively. Subjects classified as treatment failures at day 22 to 26 had a lower mean plasma concentration of rifalazil at the visit on day 8 to 12 than those classified as treatment cures, but this difference was not significant; however, the levels were similar for both groups at the visit on day 22 to 26. A single 25-mg dose of rifalazil was well tolerated and eradicated C. trachomatis in most of these women with uncomplicated genital C. trachomatis infection. (The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under registration no. NCT01631201). Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items