Publication

Pilot Evaluation of Anti-1-amino-2-[18F] fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-2-[18F] FACPC) PET-CT in Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Bital Savir Baruch, Emory UniversityDavid M. Schuster, Emory UniversityNashwa Jarkas, Emory UniversityViraj Master, Emory UniversityPeter T Nieh, Emory UniversityRaghuveer Halkar, Emory UniversityJonathon A Nye, Emory UniversityMelinda M Lewis, Emory UniversityRonald Crowe, Emory UniversityRonald Voll, Emory UniversityVernon M. Camp, Emory UniversityLeah M. Bellamy, Emory UniversityDavid L Roberts, Emory UniversityMark Goodman, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2011-12
Publisher
  • Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © Academy of Molecular Imaging and Society for Molecular Imaging, 2010
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1536-1632
Volume
  • 13
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 1272
End Page
  • 1277
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was sponsored by the Georgia Cancer Coalition, the Georgia Research Alliance and the NIH (R01CA129356).
Abstract
  • Purpose Anti-1-amino-2-[18F]fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-2-[18F]FACPC) is an unnatural alicyclic amino acid radiotracer with high uptake in the DU-145 prostate cancer cell line in vitro. Our goal was to determine if anti-2-[18F]FACPC is useful in the detection of prostate carcinoma. Procedures Five patients with elevated PSA (1.1–20.5 ng/mL) after curative therapy for prostate carcinoma underwent 60 min dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) of the pelvis after IV injection of 193–340 MBq of anti-2-[18F]FACPC. Uptake was compared against PET scans in the same patients with the leucine analog, anti-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-[18F]FACBC), at similar time points and validated via pathology, clinical, and imaging follow-up. Results At 5 min, average (±SD) SUVmax of malignant lesions is 4.1(±1.3) for anti-2-[18F] FACPC and 4.3(±1.1) for anti-[18F]FACBC. Yet, blood pool activity at 5 min is significantly higher for anti-2-[18F]FACPC with average (±SD) lesion/blood pool SUVmax/SUVmean ratio of 1.4 (±0.5) vs. 3.0 (±0.9) for anti-[18F]FACBC. At 20 min, average (±SD) SUVmax of malignant lesions is 2.6 (±1.0) for anti-2-[18F]FACPC and 3.4 (±0.8) for anti-[18F]FACBC. Yet, bladder activity at 20 min is significantly more intense for anti-2-[18F] FACPC with average (±SD) lesion/bladder SUVmax/SUVmean ratio of 0.3 (±0.8) vs. 2.3 (±1.4) for anti-[18F]FACBC. Conclusions While prostate bed lesions are visible on early imaging with anti-2-[18F]FACPC, there is high blood pool activity obscuring nodes. As blood pool fades, nodal uptake decreases and high bladder activity then obscures pelvic structures. Compared with anti-[18F]FACBC, imaging characteristics for anti-2-[18F]FACPC are unfavorable for pelvic recurrent prostate carcinoma detection.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Radiation

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items