Publication

Pak1, adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, and breast cancer recurrence risk in a Danish population-based study

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/03/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Thomas P. Ahern, University of Vermont College of MedicineDeirdre P. Cronin-Fenton, Aarhus University HospitalTimothy Lash, Emory UniversityHenrik Toft Sorensen, Aarhus University HospitalAnne Gulbech Ording, Aarhus University HospitalStephen J. Hamilton-Dutoit, Aarhus University HospitalYlva Hellberg, Aarhus University Hospital
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-04-08
Publisher
  • Taylor & Francis
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0284-186X
Volume
  • 55
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 734
End Page
  • 741
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was supported by the Danish Medical Research Council [DOK 1158859 (T. L. Lash)] US National Cancer Institute at the US National Institutes of Health [R01 CA118708 and R01 CA166825 (T. L. Lash) and T32 CA09001-35 (T. P. Ahern)]; Danish Cancer Society [DP06117 (S. Hamilton-Dutoit)]; Karen Elise Jensen Foundation (H. T. Sørensen); Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs [BC073012 (T. P. Ahern)]; and Susan G. Komen for the Cure [CCR13264024 (T. P. Ahern)]; and the Lundbeck Foundation [R167-2013-15861 (D. P. Cronin-Fenton)].
Abstract
  • Background: Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy approximately halves the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer recurrence, but many women do not respond to therapy. Observational studies nested in clinical trial populations suggest that overexpression or nuclear localization of p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) in primary tumors predicts tamoxifen failure. Material and methods: We measured the association between Pak1 expression and breast cancer recurrence in a Danish population-based case-control study. Pak1 cytoplasmic expression level and nuclear positivity were determined by immunohistochemical staining of primary breast tumors from recurrence cases and matched controls from two breast cancer populations; women diagnosed with ER-positive tumors who received at least one year of tamoxifen therapy (ER+/TAM+), and women diagnosed with ER-negative tumors who survived for at least one year (ER−/TAM−). Pak1 staining was assessed by a single, blinded pathologist, and associations were estimated with conditional logistic regression models. Results: We included 541 recurrence cases and 1:1 matched controls from the ER+/TAM + group and 300 recurrence cases and 1:1 matched controls from the ER−/TAM − group. Pak1 cytoplasmic intensity was not associated with breast cancer recurrence in either group (ER+/TAM + ORadj for strong vs. no cytoplasmic staining = 0.91, 95% CI 0.57, 1.5; ER−/TAM − ORadj for strong vs. no cytoplasmic staining = 0.74, 95% CI 0.39, 1.4). Associations between Pak1 nuclear positivity and breast cancer recurrence were similarly near null in both groups. Conclusion: Pak1 positivity in primary breast tumors was neither predictive nor prognostic in this prospective, population-based study.
Author Notes
  • CONTACT: T. Ahern thomas.ahern@med.uvm.edu University of Vermont College of Medicine, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Given D317A, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Pathology
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items