Publication

Effects of a Hypocaloric, Nutritionally Complete, Higher Protein Meal Plan on Regional Body Fat and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Older Adults with Obesity

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Monica Serra, Emory UniversityDaniel P. Beavers, Wake Forest School of MedicineRebecca M. Henderson, Wake Forest School of MedicineJessica L. Kelleher, Emory UniversityJessica R. Kiel, Medifast, Inc.Kristen M. Beavers, Wake Forest University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-02-12
Publisher
  • Karger Publishers
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0250-6807
Volume
  • 74
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • 149
End Page
  • 155
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by an in-kind donation of the meal replacements used in the study and a grant from Jason Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Medifast, Inc., as well as the Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30 AG21332), a National Institute on Aging supported career development award (K01 AG047921) to K.M.B., and US Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation R&D Service career development award (IK2 RX-000944) to M.C.S.
Abstract
  • Background: Whether improvements in cardiometabolic health following weight loss (WL) are associated with changes in regional body fat distribution (gluteal vs. -android) is not well documented. Methods: Older (age: 70 ± 4 years; mean ± SD) adults with obesity were randomized to a 6-month WL program (WL; n = 47), accomplished using a hypocaloric, nutritionally complete, higher protein -(targeting ≥1.0 g/kg/day) meal plan, or a weight stability (WS; n = 49) program. Android, gynoid, visceral, and subcutaneous abdominal fat masses (via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and fasting glucose and lipid profiles were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Results: The WL group lost more body weight (WL: -8.6% vs. WS: -1.7%, p < 0.01), resulting in a reduction in fat mass at each region only following WL (all p < 0.05). The decline in the ratio of android/gynoid fat mass also was significant only following WL, resulting in greater declines than WS (mean [95% CI]; WL: -0.026 [-0.040 to -0.011] vs. WS: 0.003 [-0.012 to 0.019] g, p < 0.01). The change in the ratio of visceral/subcutaneous abdominal fat mass was not significant in either group and did not differ between groups (WL: 0.65 [-0.38 to 1.68] vs. WS: 0.05 [-1.00 to 1.10] g, p = 0.42). In general, the improvements in glucose and lipid profiles were associated with declines in fat mass at the gynoid and android regions (r's = 0.20-0.42, all p < 0.05), particularly the visceral depot but not the ratios. Conclusion: WL achieved via a hypocaloric, nutritionally complete, higher protein meal plan is effective in reducing body fat in the android, gynoid, and visceral depots, which relate to cardiometabolic improvements.
Author Notes
  • Monica C. Serra, PhD, Department of Medicine, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 1670 Clairmont Rd (151-R), Atlanta GA 30033 (USA), mserra@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Nutrition
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items