Publication

Multi-component interventions and change in screening rates in primary care clinics in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/17/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Krishna P Sharma, CDC, AtlantaAmy DeGroff, CDC, AtlantaSarah D Hohl, University of WashingtonAnnette E Maxwell, University of California Los AngelesNgoc-Cam Escoffery, Emory UniversitySusan A Sabatino, CDC, AtlantaDjenaba A Joseph, CDC, Atlanta
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-07-16
Publisher
  • ELSEVIER
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 29
Start Page
  • 101904
End Page
  • 101904
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported, in part, by CDC funds through a contract from the National Association of Chronic Disease Directors to the University of Washington. Additional support was provided by CDC and the National Cancer Institute through the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network, a network within CDC’s Prevention Research Centers program (Emory University, U48DP006377; University of Washington, U48DP005013 and U48DP006398).
Abstract
  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality. Implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) increases CRC screening. The purpose of this analysis is to determine which combinations of EBIs or strategies led to increases in clinic-level screening rates among clinics participating in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). Data were collected from CRCCP clinics between 2015 and 2018 and the analysis was conducted in 2020. The outcome variable was the annual change in clinic level CRC screening rate in percentage points. We used first difference (FD) estimator of linear panel data regression model to estimate the associations of outcome with independent variables, which include different combinations of EBIs and intervention strategies. The study sample included 486 unique clinics with 1156 clinic years of total observations. The average baseline screening rate was 41 % with average annual increase of 4.6 percentage points. Only two out of six combinations of any two EBIs were associated with increases in screening rate (largest was 6.5 percentage points, P < 0.001). Any combinations involving three EBIs or all four EBIs were significantly associated with the outcome with largest increase of 7.2 percentage points (P < 0.001). All interventions involving 2–3 strategies led to increases in rate with largest increase associated with the combination of increasing community demand and access (6.1 percentage points, P < 0.001). Clinics implementing combinations of these EBIs, particularly those including three or more EBIs, often were more likely to have impact on screening rate change than those implementing none.
Author Notes
  • Krishna P. Sharma, 4770 Buford Hwy, MF107-4, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States. Email: ksharma@cdc.gov
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items