Publication

Remaining challenges in predicting patient outcomes for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    R. Andrew Harkins, Emory UniversityAndres Chang, Emory UniversitySharvil P. Patel, Emory UniversityMichelle J. Lee, Emory UniversityJordan S. Goldstein, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeSelin Merdan, Emory UniversityChristopher Flowers, Emory UniversityJean Koff, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-09-14
Publisher
  • Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 12
Issue
  • 11
Start Page
  • 959
End Page
  • 973
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under RA Harkin’s Award Numbers UL1TR002378 and TL1TR002382;
  • CR Flowers’ NCI Award K24CA208132.
  • Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Nell W. and William S. Elkin Fellowship to A Chang; A Chang’s National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute(NCI) grant T32CA160040;
Abstract
  • Introduction Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is an aggressive malignancy with heterogeneous outcomes. Diverse methods for DLBCL outcomes assessment ranging from clinical to genomic have been developed with variable predictive and prognostic success. Areas covered The authors provide an overview of the various methods currently used to estimate prognosis in DLBCL patients. Models incorporating cell of origin, genomic features, sociodemographic factors, treatment effectiveness measures, and machine learning are described. Expert opinion The clinical and genetic heterogeneity of DLBCL presents distinct challenges in predicting response to therapy and overall prognosis. Successful integration of predictive and prognostic tools in clinical trials and in a standard clinical workflow for DLBCL will likely require a combination of methods incorporating clinical, sociodemographic, and molecular factors with the aid of machine learning and high-dimensional data analysis.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Christopher R. Flowers, Address: Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322-1007, USA, crflowe@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Biology, Cell

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items