Publication
Community-Level Economic Distress, Race, and Risk of Adverse Outcomes After Heart Failure Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 08/18/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2022-01-11
- Publisher
- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 2
- Start Page
- 110
- End Page
- 121
- Grant/Funding Information
- The current research was partly funded by philanthropic gifts by the Haslam Family, Bailey Family and Khouri family to the Cleveland Clinic (PI: Dr. Desai). Dr. Pandey has received research support from the Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholarship, the Gilead Sciences Research Scholar Program, the National Institute on Aging GEMSSTAR Grant (1R03AG067960–01), and Applied Therapeutics.
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Background: Socioeconomic disadvantage is a strong determinant of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. However, the contribution of community-level economic distress to adverse outcomes in heart failure may differ across races and ethnicities. Methods: Patients of self-reported Black, White, and Hispanic race and ethnicity hospitalized with heart failure between 2014 and 2019 were identified from the Medicare MedPAR Part A 100% Files. We used patient-level residential ZIP code to quantify community-level economic distress on the basis of the Distressed Community Index (quintile 5: economically distressed versus quintiles 1-4: nondistressed). The association of continuous and categorical measures (distressed versus nondistressed) of Distressed Community Index with 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality, readmission burden, and home time were assessed separately by race and ethnicity groups. Results: The study included 1 611 586 White (13.2% economically distressed), 205 840 Black (50.6% economically distressed), and 89 199 Hispanic (27.3% economically distressed) patients. Among White patients, living in economically distressed (versus nondistressed) communities was significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes at 30-day and 1-year follow-up. Among Black and Hispanic patients, the risk of adverse outcomes associated with living in distressed versus nondistressed communities was not meaningfully different at 30 days and became more prominent by 1-year follow-up. Similarly, in the restricted cubic spline analysis, a stronger and more graded association was observed between Distressed Community Index score and risk of adverse outcomes in White patients (versus Black and Hispanic patients). Furthermore, the association between community-level economic distress and risk of adverse outcomes for Black patients differed in rural versus urban areas. Living in economically distressed communities was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality and lower home time at 1-year follow-up in rural areas but not urban areas. Conclusions: The association between community-level economic distress and risk of adverse outcomes differs across race and ethnic groups, with a stronger association noted in White patients at short- and long-term follow-up. Among Black patients, the association of community-level economic distress with a higher risk of adverse outcomes is less evident in the short term and is more robust and significant in the long-term follow-up and rural areas.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - w4q65.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-06-01 | Public | Download |