Publication

Neutralizing antibody affords comparable protection against vaginal and rectal simian/human immunodeficiency virus challenge in macaques

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/03/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Brian Moldt, Scripps Research InstituteKhoa Le, Scripps Research InstituteDiane G. Carnathan, Emory UniversityJames B Whitney, Harvard UniversityNiccole Schultz, Scripps Research InstituteMark G. Lewis, Bioqual IncErica Borducchi, Harvard UniversityKaitlin Smith, Harvard UniversityJoseph J. Mackel, Emory UniversityShelby L. Sweat, Emory UniversityAndrew P. Hodges, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery InstituteAdam Godzik, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery InstitutePaul W. H. I. Parren, GenmabGuido Silvestri, Emory UniversityDan H. Barouch, Harvard UniversityDennis R. Burton, Scripps Research Institute
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-06-19
Publisher
  • Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0269-9370
Volume
  • 30
Issue
  • 10
Start Page
  • 1543
End Page
  • 1551
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by the NIH/CHAVI-ID grant UM1 AI100663, NIH/NCRR grant P51RR000165, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation/International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) Neutralizing Antibody Consortium grants SFP 2120 and SFP 2121.
  • The Yerkes National Primate Research Center was supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD P51OD011132.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Objective: Passive administration of broadly neutralizing antibodies has been shown to protect against both vaginal and rectal challenge in the simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)/macaque model of HIV transmission. However, the relative efficacy of antibody against the two modes of exposure is unknown and, given differences in the composition and immunology of the two tissue compartments, this is an important gap in knowledge. To investigate the significance of the challenge route for antibody-mediated protection, we performed a comparative protection study in macaques using the highly potent human monoclonal antibody, PGT126. Design: Animals were administered PGT126 at three different doses before challenged either vaginally or rectally with a single dose of SHIV SF163P3. Methods: Viral loads, PGT126 serum concentrations, and serum neutralizing titers were monitored. Results: In vaginally challenged animals, sterilizing immunity was achieved in all animals administered 10 mg/kg, in two of five animals administered 2 mg/kg and in one of five animals administered 0.4 mg/kg PGT126. Comparable protection was observed for the corresponding groups challenged rectally as sterilizing immunity was achieved in three of four animals administered 10 mg/kg, in two of four animals administered 2 mg/kg and in none of four animals administered 0.4 mg/kg PGT126. Serological analysis showed similar serum concentrations of PGT126 and serum neutralization titers in animals administered the same antibody dose. Conclusion: Our data suggest that broadly neutralizing antibody-mediated protection is not strongly dependent on the mucosal route of challenge, which indicates that a vaccine aimed to induce a neutralizing antibody response would have broadly similar efficacy against both primary transmission routes for HIV.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding author: Dennis R. Burton, Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA. burton@scripps.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items