Publication

Establishing between-session reliability of TMS-conditioned soleus H-reflexes

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    WA Gray, Emory UniversityManning Sabatier, Emory UniversityTrisha M. Kesar, Emory UniversityMichael R. Borich, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-02-15
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0304-3940
Volume
  • 640
Start Page
  • 47
End Page
  • 52
Grant/Funding Information
  • MJS is supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number HD083727-01A] and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society [PP2321].
  • MRB is supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [grant number K12HD055931] and was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number 5R24HD050821-11].
  • WAG was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [grant number 1U10NS086607].
  • TMK is supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [grant number K01 HD079584].
Abstract
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can be used to evaluate descending corticomotor influences on spinal reflex excitability through modulation of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex). The purpose of this study was to characterize between-session reliability of cortical, spinal, and cortical-conditioned spinal excitability measures collected from the soleus muscle. Thirteen able-bodied young adult participants were tested over four sessions. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to quantify between-session reliability of active motor threshold (AMT), unconditioned H-reflexes (expressed as a percentage of Mmax), and conditioned H-reflexes using short-latency facilitation (SLF) and long-latency facilitation (LLF). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess associations between H-reflex facilitation and unconditioned H-reflex amplitude. Between-session reliability for SLF (ICC=0.71) was higher than for LLF (ICC=0.45), was excellent for AMT (ICC=0.95), and was moderate for unconditioned H-reflexes (ICC=0.63). Our results suggest moderate-to-good reliability of SLF and LLF to evaluate cortical influences on spinal reflex excitability across multiple testing sessions in able-bodied individuals.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding author at: Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1441 Clifton Road NE, R228, Atlanta, GA, 30322 USA. michael.borich@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items