Publication

Development of the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI)

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Hazel Malapit, International Food Policy Research InstituteAgnes Quisumbing, International Food Policy Research InstituteRuth Meinzen-Dick, International Food Policy Research InstituteGreg Seymour, International Food Policy Research InstituteElena M. Martinez, International Food Policy Research InstituteJessica Heckert, International Food Policy Research InstituteDeborah Rubin, Cultural Practice, LLCAna Vaz, Oxford Poverty and Human Development InitiativeKathryn Yount, Emory UniversityLauren Maxwell, Emory UniversityGender Agriculture Assets Project Phase 2 Study Team
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-10-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: 24 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 The Authors
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0305-750X
Volume
  • 122
Start Page
  • 675
End Page
  • 692
Grant/Funding Information
  • Funding support for this study was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) [Grant number: OPP1125297]; the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [Grant number: EEM-G-00-04-00013-00]; and A4NH.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • With growing commitment to women's empowerment by agricultural development agencies, sound methods and indicators to measure women's empowerment are needed to learn which types of projects or project-implementation strategies do and do not work to empower women. The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI), which has been widely used, requires adaptation to meet the need for monitoring projects and assessing their impacts. In this paper, the authors describe the adaptation and validation of a project-level WEAI (or pro-WEAI) that agricultural development projects can use to identify key areas of women's (and men's) disempowerment, design appropriate strategies to address identified deficiencies, and monitor project outcomes related to women's empowerment. The 12 pro-WEAI indicators are mapped to three domains: intrinsic agency (power within), instrumental agency (power to), and collective agency (power with). A gender parity index compares the empowerment scores of men and women in the same household. The authors describe the development of pro-WEAI, including: (1) pro-WEAI's distinctiveness from other versions of the WEAI; (2) the process of piloting pro-WEAI in 13 agricultural development projects during the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project, phase 2 (GAAP2); (3) analysis of quantitative data from the GAAP2 projects, including intrahousehold patterns of empowerment/disempowerment; and (4) a summary of the findings from the qualitative work exploring concepts of women's empowerment in the project sites. The paper concludes with a discussion of lessons learned from pro-WEAI and possibilities for further development of empowerment metrics.
Author Notes
  • Hazel Malapit, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005-3915, USA. E-mail: h.malapit@cgiar.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items