Publication

A four-group urine risk classifier for predicting outcomes in patients with prostate cancer

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Shea P. Connell, University of East AngliaMarcelino Yazbek-Hanna, University of East AngliaFrank McCarthy, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton UKRachel Hurst, University of East AngliaMartyn Webb, University of East AngliaHelen Curley, University of East AngliaHelen Walker, Norfolk and Norwich University HospitalsRob Mills, Norfolk and Norwich University HospitalsRichard Y. Ball, Norfolk and Norwich University HospitalsMartin Sanda, Emory UniversityKathryn L. Pellegrini, Emory UniversityDattatraya Patil, Emory UniversityAntoinette S. Perry, University College DublinJack Schalken, Radboud University NijmegenHardev Pandha, University of SurreyHayley Whitaker, University College LondonNening Dennis, Institute of Cancer Research, SuttonChristine Stuttle, Institute of Cancer Research, SuttonIan G. Mills, Queens University BelfastIngrid Guldvik, University of Oslo
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-10-01
Publisher
  • Wiley
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 The Authors
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1464-4096
Volume
  • 124
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • 609
End Page
  • 620
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was possible thanks to the Movember Foundation GAP1 Urine Biomarker project, The Masonic Charitable Foundation, The Bob Champion Cancer Trust, the King family, The Andy Ripley Memorial Fund and the Stephen Hargrave Trust
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Objectives: To develop a risk classifier using urine-derived extracellular vesicle (EV)-RNA capable of providing diagnostic information on disease status prior to biopsy, and prognostic information for men on active surveillance (AS). Patients and Methods: Post-digital rectal examination urine-derived EV-RNA expression profiles (n = 535, multiple centres) were interrogated with a curated NanoString panel. A LASSO-based continuation ratio model was built to generate four prostate urine risk (PUR) signatures for predicting the probability of normal tissue (PUR-1), D'Amico low-risk (PUR-2), intermediate-risk (PUR-3), and high-risk (PUR-4) prostate cancer. This model was applied to a test cohort (n = 177) for diagnostic evaluation, and to an AS sub-cohort (n = 87) for prognostic evaluation. Results: Each PUR signature was significantly associated with its corresponding clinical category (P < 0.001). PUR-4 status predicted the presence of clinically significant intermediate- or high-risk disease (area under the curve = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.84). Application of PUR provided a net benefit over current clinical practice. In an AS sub-cohort (n = 87), groups defined by PUR status and proportion of PUR-4 had a significant association with time to progression (interquartile range hazard ratio [HR] 2.86, 95% CI 1.83–4.47; P < 0.001). PUR-4, when used continuously, dichotomized patient groups with differential progression rates of 10% and 60% 5 years after urine collection (HR 8.23, 95% CI 3.26–20.81; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Urine-derived EV-RNA can provide diagnostic information on aggressive prostate cancer prior to biopsy, and prognostic information for men on AS. PUR represents a new and versatile biomarker that could result in substantial alterations to current treatment of patients with prostate cancer.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Genetics
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items