Publication

Internal Medicine Residents' Knowledge and Practice of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Natasha Chida, Johns Hopkins UniversityChristopher Brown, Cornell UniversityJyoti Mathad, Cornell UniversityKelly Carpenter, Vanderbilt UniversityGeorge Nelson, Vanderbilt UniversityMarcos Coutinho Schechter, Emory UniversityNatalie Giles, Emory UniversityPaulina Rebolledo Esteinou, Emory UniversitySusan M Ray, Emory UniversityValeria Fabre, Brown UniversityDiana Silva Cantillo, Brown UniversitySarah Longworth, University of PennsylvaniaValerianna Amorosa, University of PennsylvaniaChristian Petrauskis, University of MiamiCatherine Boulanger, University of MiamiNatalie Cain, University of MiamiAmita Gupta, Johns Hopkins UniversityJane McKenzie-White, Johns Hopkins UniversityRobert Bollinger, Johns Hopkins UniversityMichael T Melia, Johns Hopkins University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-07-01
Publisher
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2328-8957
Volume
  • 5
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • ofy152
End Page
  • ofy152
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (T32 AI007291-23 to N.C.) and the Ujala Foundation (114060 to the Center for Clinical Global Health Education).
Abstract
  • Background. Internal medicine physicians are often the first providers to encounter patients with a new diagnosis of tuberculosis. Given the public health risks of missed tuberculosis cases, assessing internal medicine residents' ability to diagnose tuberculosis is important. Methods. Internal medicine resident knowledge and practice patterns in pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis at 7 academic hospitals were assessed utilizing (a) a 10-item validated pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis assessment tool and (b) a retrospective chart review of 343 patients who underwent a pulmonary tuberculosis evaluation while admitted to a resident-staffed internal medicine or infectious disease service. Our primary outcomes were the mean score and percentage of correct responses per assessment tool question, and the percentage of patients who had Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended tuberculosis diagnostic tests obtained. Results. Of the 886 residents who received the assessment, 541 responded, yielding a response rate of 61%. The mean score on the assessment tool (SD) was 4.4 (1.6), and the correct response rate was 57% (311/541) or less on 9 of 10 questions. On chart review, each recommended test was obtained for ≤ 43% (148/343) of patients, other than chest x-ray (328/343; 96%). A nucleic acid amplification test was obtained for 18% (62/343) of patients, whereas 24% (83/343) had only 1 respiratory sample obtained. Twenty patients were diagnosed with tuberculosis. Conclusions. Significant knowledge and practice gaps exist in internal medicine residents' abilities to diagnose tuberculosis. As residents represent the future providers who will be evaluating patients with possible tuberculosis, such deficiencies must be addressed.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: N. Chida, MD, MSPH, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 (nchida1@jhmi.edu).
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items