Publication

Lessons learned from MPI and physiologic testing in randomized trials of stable ischemic heart disease: COURAGE, BARI 2D, FAME, and ISCHEMIA

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Lawrence M. Phillips, New York UniversityRory Hachamovitch, Cleveland Clinic FoundationDaniel S. Berman, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterAmi E. Iskandrian, University of Alabama BirminghamJames K. Min, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeMichael H. Picard, Massachusetts General HospitalRaymond Y. Kwong, Brigham & WomenGuos HospitalMatthias G. Friedrich, Montreal Heart InstituteMarielle Scherrer-Crosbie, Massachusetts General HospitalSean W. Hayes, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTali Sharir, Assuta Medical CenterGilbert Gosselin, Montreal Heart InstituteMarco Mazzanti, University Hospital of AnconaRoxy Senior, Northwick Park HospitalRob Beanlands, Ottawa Heart InsitutePaolo Smanio, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de CardiologiaAbhinav Goyal, Emory UniversityMouaz Al-Mallah, King Abdulaziz Cardiac CenterHarmony Reynolds, New York UniversityGregg W. Stone, Columbia UniversityDavid J. Maron, Vanderbilt UniversityLeslee J Shaw, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-12-01
Publisher
  • Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2013 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1071-3581
Volume
  • 20
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 969
End Page
  • 975
Abstract
  • There is a preponderance of evidence that, in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, an invasive approach using coronary revascularization has a morbidity and mortality benefit. However, recent stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) randomized clinical trials testing whether the addition of coronary revascularization to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) reduces death or major cardiovascular events have been negative. Based on the evidence from these trials, the primary role of GDMT as a front line medical management approach has been clearly defined in the recent SIHD clinical practice guideline; the role of prompt revascularization is less precisely defined. Based on data from observational studies, it has been hypothesized that there is a level of ischemia above which a revascularization strategy might result in benefit regarding cardiovascular events. However, eligibility for recent negative trials in SIHD has mandated at most minimal standards for ischemia. An ongoing randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of randomization of patients to coronary angiography and revascularization as compared to no coronary angiography and GDMT in patients with moderate-severe ischemia will formally test this hypothesis. The current review will highlight the available evidence including a review of the published and ongoing SIHD trials.
Author Notes
  • Lawrence M. Phillips, MD, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Avenue, SKI-9U, New York, NY 10016; Lawrence.Phillips@nyumc.org.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Radiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items