Publication

National and State-Specific Attitudes toward Smoke-Free Parks among US Adults

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Judy Kruger, Emory UniversityAmal Jama, DB Consulting GroupMichelle Kegler, Emory UniversityKristy Marynak, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionBrian King, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-09-01
Publisher
  • MDPI
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1660-4601
Volume
  • 13
Issue
  • 9
Grant/Funding Information
  • Michelle Kegler funded by the National Cancer Institute under the State and Community Tobacco Control Initiative, Grant Number UO1-CA154282.
  • No funding, direct or indirect, for CDC authors.
Abstract
  • Outdoor places, such as parks, remain a source of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. We assessed attitudes toward smoke-free parks among U.S. adults. Data came from the 2009–2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey, a landline and cellular telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged ≥18 in the 50 U.S. states and D.C. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to assess the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of attitudes toward smoke-free parks, overall and by current tobacco use. Overall, 38.5% of adults reported favorable attitudes toward complete smoke-free parks; prevalence ranged from 29.2% in Kentucky to 48.2% in Maine. Prevalence of favorable attitudes toward smoke-free parks was higher among nonusers of tobacco (44.6%) and noncombustible-only users (30.0%) than any combustible users (21.3%). The adjusted odds of having a favorable attitude were higher among: women; Hispanics and Black non-Hispanics, American Indian and Alaska Native non-Hispanics, and other non-Hispanics; those with an unspecified sexual orientation; and those with children aged ≤17 in the household, relative to each characteristics respective referent group. Odds were lower among: any combustible tobacco and noncombustible-only tobacco users; adults aged 45–64; and those with some college or an undergraduate degree. Opportunities exist to educate the public about the benefits of smoke-free outdoor environments.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items