Publication

Impact of oral anticoagulation choice on healthcare utilization for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 08/27/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Alvaro Alonso, Emory UniversityPamela L Lutsey, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisRichard F MacLehose, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisJ’Neka S Claxton, Emory UniversityRob F Walker, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisTerrence J Adam, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisAlvaro Zakai, University of Vermont
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-07-27
Publisher
  • SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2020.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 25
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 549
End Page
  • 556
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by NIH National Heart Lung and Blood Institute grants R01-HL131579 and R01-HL122200.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Little is known about the impact of oral anticoagulation (OAC) choice on healthcare encounters during venous thromboembolism (VTE) primary treatment. Among anticoagulant-naïve patients with VTE, we tested the hypotheses that healthcare utilization would be lower among users of direct OACs (DOACs; rivaroxaban or apixaban) than among users of warfarin. MarketScan databases for years 2016 and 2017 were used; healthcare utilization was identified in the first 6 months after initial VTE diagnoses. The 23,864 patients with VTE had on average 0.2 ± 0.5 hospitalizations, spent 1.3 ± 5.2 days in the hospital, had 5.7 ± 5.1 outpatient encounters, and visited an emergency department 0.4 ± 1.1 times. As compared to warfarin, rivaroxaban and apixaban were associated with fewer hospitalizations, days hospitalized, outpatient office visits, and emergency department visits after accounting for age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Hospitalization rates were 24% lower (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.83) with rivaroxaban and 22% lower (IRR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.87) with apixaban, as compared to warfarin (IRR: 1.00 (reference)). Healthcare utilization was similar between apixaban and rivaroxaban users. Patients with VTE prescribed rivaroxaban and apixaban had lower healthcare utilization than those prescribed warfarin, while there was no difference when comparing apixaban to rivaroxaban. These findings complement existing literature supporting the use of DOACs over warfarin.
Author Notes
  • Pamela L. Lutsey, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, 1300 S 2nd St, Suite 300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 United States, Fax: 612-624-0315, Phone: 612-624-5812, Email: lutsey@umn.edu
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items