Publication

Outcomes after vascular resection during curative-intent resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Gregory V. Schimizzi, Washington UniversityLinda X Jin, Washington UniversityJesse T. Davidson, IV, Washington UniversityBradley A. Krasnick, Washington UniversityCecilia G. Ethun, Emory UniversityTimothy M. Pawlik, Johns Hopkins University HospitalGeorge Poultsides, Stanford UniversityThuy Tran, Stanford UniversityKamran Idrees, Vanderbilt UniversityChelsea A. Isom, Vanderbilt UniversitySharon M. Weber, Univ WisconsinAhmed Salem, University of WisconsinWilliam G. Hawkins, Washington UniversitySteven M. Strasberg, Washington UniversityMaria B. Doyle, Washington UniversityWilliam C. Chapman, Washington UniversityRobert C.G. Martin, University of LouisvilleCharles Scoggins, University of LouisvillePerry Shen, Wake Forest UniversityHarveshp D. Mogal, Wake Forest UniversityCarl Schmidt, Ohio State UniversityEliza Beal, Ohio State UniversityIoannis Hatzaras, New York UniversityRivfka Shenoy, New York UniversityShishir Kumar Maithel, Emory UniversityRyan C. Fields, Washington UniversityRichard Martin, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-04-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1365-182X
Volume
  • 20
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • 332
End Page
  • 339
Abstract
  • Background: Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative-intent therapy for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). The role of vascular resection (VR) in the treatment of HC in western centres is not well defined. Methods: Utilizing data from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium, patients were grouped into those who underwent resection for HC based on VR status: no VR, portal vein resection (PVR), or hepatic artery resection (HAR). Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were analyzed. Results: Between 1998 and 2015, 201 patients underwent resection for HC, of which 31 (15%) underwent VR: 19 patients (9%) underwent PVR alone and 12 patients (6%) underwent HAR either with (n = 2) or without PVR (n = 10). Patients selected for VR tended to be younger with higher stage disease. Rates of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were similar when stratified by vascular resection status. On multivariate analysis, receipt of PVR or HAR did not significantly affect OS or RFS. Conclusion: In a modern, multi-institutional cohort of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for HC, VR appears to be a safe procedure in a highly selected subset, although long-term survival outcomes appear equivalent. VR should be considered only in select patients based on tumor and patient characteristics.
Author Notes
  • Ryan C. Fields, M.D, F.A.C.S., Associate Professor of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine,660 South Euclid Avenue,Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110-8109, Phone: (314) 286-1694, Fax: (314) 222-6255,fieldsr@wustl.edu.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items