Publication

Pilot Study Results from a Brief Intervention to Create Smoke-Free Homes

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Michelle C Kegler, Emory UniversityNgoc Cam Escoffery, Emory UniversityLucja Bundy, Emory UniversityCarla Berg, Emory UniversityRegine Haardoerfer, Emory UniversityDebbie Yembra, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2012
Publisher
  • Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2012 Michelle C. Kegler et al.
License
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1687-9805
Volume
  • 2012
Grant/Funding Information
  • This paper was also supported by Grant no. U01CA154282 from the National Cancer Institute.
  • This paper was supported by Cooperative Agreement no. 5U48DP001909, SIP 009 Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract
  • Very few community-based intervention studies have examined how to effectively increase the adoption of smoke-free homes. A pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility, acceptability, and short-term outcomes of a brief, four-component intervention for promoting smoke-free home policies among low-income households. We recruited forty participants (20 smokers and 20 nonsmokers) to receive the intervention at two-week intervals. The design was a pretest-posttest with follow-up at two weeks after intervention. The primary outcome measure was self-reported presence of a total home smoking ban. At follow-up, 78% of participants reported having tried to establish a smoke-free rule in their home, with significantly more nonsmokers attempting a smoke-free home than smokers (P = .03). These attempts led to increased smoking restrictions, that is, going from no ban to a partial or total ban, or from a partial to a total ban, in 43% of the homes. At follow-up, 33% of the participants reported having made their home totally smoke-free. Additionally, smokers reported smoking fewer cigarettes per day. Results suggest that the intervention is promising and warrants a rigorous efficacy trial.
Author Notes
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Psychology, Behavioral

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items