Publication

Improved Cartilage Protection with Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/17/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Riley B. Brackin, Emory UniversityGail E. McColgan, Emory UniversitySaitheja A. Pucha, Emory UniversityMichael A. Kowalski, Emory UniversityHicham Drissi, Emory UniversityThanh N. Doan, Emory UniversityJay Milan Patel, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-09-19
Publisher
  • MDPI
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 10
Issue
  • 9
Start Page
  • 1013
Abstract
  • Traumatic joint injuries are common, leading to progressive tissue degeneration and the development of osteoarthritis. The post-traumatic joint experiences a pro-inflammatory milieu, initiating a subtle but deteriorative process in cartilage tissue. To prevent or even reverse this process, our group previously developed a tissue-penetrating methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel system, crosslinked within cartilage to restore and/or protect the tissue. In the current study, we further optimized this approach by investigating the impact of biomaterial molecular weight (MW; 20, 75, 100 kDa) on its integration within and reinforcement of cartilage, as well as its ability to protect tissue degradation in a catabolic state. Indeed, the low MW MeHA integrated and reinforced cartilage tissue better than the high MW counterparts. Furthermore, in a 2 week IL-1β explant culture model, the 20 kDa MeHA demonstrated the most protection from biphasic mechanical loss, best retention of proteoglycans (Safranin O staining), and least aggrecan breakdown (NITEGE). Thus, the lower MW MeHA gels integrated better into the tissue and provided the greatest protection of the cartilage matrix. Future work will test this formulation in a preclinical model, with the goal of translating this therapeutic approach for cartilage preservation.
Author Notes
  • Author Contributions: Riley B. Brackin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Gail E. McColgan: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing R.B.B. and G.E.M. contributed equally to this work. Saitheja A. Pucha: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing Michael A. Kowalski: Methodology, Writing – review & editing Hicham Drissi: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Thanh N. Doan: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing Jay M. Patel: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition Conceptualization: R.B.B., H.D., T.N.D. and J.M.P. Methodology: R.B.B., G.E.M., M.A.K. and J.M.P Investigation: R.B.B., G.E.M., S.A.P. and J.M.P. Writing—Draft Preparation: R.B.B., G.E.M., S.A.P. and J.M.P. Writing—Reviewing and Editing: All Authors Supervision and Project Administration: J.M.P.; Funding Acquisition: H.D. and J.M.P.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Engineering, Biomedical

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items