Publication
AxoNet 2.0: A Deep Learning-Based Tool for Morphometric Analysis of Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 06/25/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2023-03-01
- Publisher
- ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- 2023 The Authors
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Start Page
- 9
- End Page
- 9
- Grant/Funding Information
- Supported by NIH R01 EY025286 (CRE), 5T32 EY007092-32 (BGH), Department of Veteran Affairs R&D Service Career Development Award (RX002342; AJF), NIH NEI EY030871 (AJF), VA EY025580 (MGA), I50 RX003002 (WD, AHB, MGA, MKG), T32DK112751 (AHB), P30 EY025580, I01 RX001481, and the Georgia Research Alliance (CRE).
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Assessment of glaucomatous damage in animal models is facilitated by rapid and accurate quantification of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axonal loss and morphologic change. However, manual assessment is extremely time-and labor-intensive. Here, we developed AxoNet 2.0, an automated deep learning (DL) tool that (i) counts normal-appearing RGC axons and (ii) quantifies their morphometry from light micrographs. Methods: A DL algorithm was trained to segment the axoplasm and myelin sheath of normal-appearing axons using manually-annotated rat optic nerve (ON) cross-sectional micrographs. Performance was quantified by various metrics (e.g., soft-Dice coefficient between predicted and ground-truth segmentations). We also quantified axon counts, axon density, and axon size distributions between hypertensive and control eyes and compared to literature reports. Results: AxoNet 2.0 performed very well when compared to manual annotations of rat ON (R2 = 0.92 for automated vs. manual counts, soft-Dice coefficient = 0.81 ± 0.02, mean absolute percentage error in axonal morphometric outcomes < 15%). AxoNet 2.0 also showed promise for generalization, performing well on other animal models (R2 = 0.97 between automated versus manual counts for mice and 0.98 for non-human primates). As expected, the algorithm detected decreased in axon density in hypertensive rat eyes (P ≪ 0.001) with preferential loss of large axons (P < 0.001). Conclusions: AxoNet 2.0 provides a fast and nonsubjective tool to quantify both RGC axon counts and morphological features, thus assisting with assessing axonal damage in animal models of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Engineering, Biomedical
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - w614z.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-06-01 | Public | Download |