Publication

AxoNet 2.0: A Deep Learning-Based Tool for Morphometric Analysis of Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Vidisha Goyal, Georgia Institute of TechnologyThomas A Read, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMatthew D Ritch, Georgia Institute of TechnologyBailey G Hannon, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGabriela S Rodriguez, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDillon M Brown, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAndrew Feola, Emory UniversityAdam Hedberg-Buenz, University of IowaGrant A Cull, Legacy Research Institute, PortlandJuan Reynaud, Legacy Research Institute, PortlandMona K Garvin, Legacy Research Institute, PortlandMichael G Anderson, University of IowaClaude F Burgoyne, Legacy Research Institute, PortlandChristopher Ethier, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-03-01
Publisher
  • ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • 2023 The Authors
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 12
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 9
End Page
  • 9
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported by NIH R01 EY025286 (CRE), 5T32 EY007092-32 (BGH), Department of Veteran Affairs R&D Service Career Development Award (RX002342; AJF), NIH NEI EY030871 (AJF), VA EY025580 (MGA), I50 RX003002 (WD, AHB, MGA, MKG), T32DK112751 (AHB), P30 EY025580, I01 RX001481, and the Georgia Research Alliance (CRE).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Purpose: Assessment of glaucomatous damage in animal models is facilitated by rapid and accurate quantification of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axonal loss and morphologic change. However, manual assessment is extremely time-and labor-intensive. Here, we developed AxoNet 2.0, an automated deep learning (DL) tool that (i) counts normal-appearing RGC axons and (ii) quantifies their morphometry from light micrographs. Methods: A DL algorithm was trained to segment the axoplasm and myelin sheath of normal-appearing axons using manually-annotated rat optic nerve (ON) cross-sectional micrographs. Performance was quantified by various metrics (e.g., soft-Dice coefficient between predicted and ground-truth segmentations). We also quantified axon counts, axon density, and axon size distributions between hypertensive and control eyes and compared to literature reports. Results: AxoNet 2.0 performed very well when compared to manual annotations of rat ON (R2 = 0.92 for automated vs. manual counts, soft-Dice coefficient = 0.81 ± 0.02, mean absolute percentage error in axonal morphometric outcomes < 15%). AxoNet 2.0 also showed promise for generalization, performing well on other animal models (R2 = 0.97 between automated versus manual counts for mice and 0.98 for non-human primates). As expected, the algorithm detected decreased in axon density in hypertensive rat eyes (P ≪ 0.001) with preferential loss of large axons (P < 0.001). Conclusions: AxoNet 2.0 provides a fast and nonsubjective tool to quantify both RGC axon counts and morphological features, thus assisting with assessing axonal damage in animal models of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Author Notes
  • C. Ross Ethier, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Drive, Room 2306, Atlanta, GA 30332-0363, USA. e-mail: ross.ethier@bme.gatech.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Engineering, Biomedical

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items