Publication

Angiotensin receptor blockade: a novel approach for symptomatic radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Mudit Chowdhary, Rush UniversityDerick Okwan-Duodu, Emory UniversityJeffrey M. Switchenko, Emory UniversityRobert H. Press, Emory UniversityJaymin Jhaveri, Emory UniversityZachary S. Buchwald, Emory UniversityJim Zhong, Emory UniversityBhavana V. Chapman, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterRanjit S. Bindra, Yale School of MedicineJoseph N. Contessa, Yale School of MedicineHenry S. Park, Yale School of MedicineJames B. Yu, Yale School of MedicineRoy H. Decker, Yale School of MedicineJeffrey James Olson, Emory UniversityNelson M Oyesiku, Emory UniversityRoss A. Abrams, Emory UniversityHui-Kuo G. Shu, Rush UniversityWalter J Curran, Emory UniversityIan Crocker, Emory UniversityKirtesh R. Patel, Yale School of Medicine
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-01-01
Publisher
  • Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0167-594X
Volume
  • 136
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • 289
End Page
  • 298
Grant/Funding Information
  • The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
  • Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292.
Abstract
  • Preclinical evidence suggests angiotensin blockade therapy (ABT) decreases late radiation toxicities. This study aims to investigate the association between ABT and symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Resected brain metastases (rBM) and arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients treated with SRS from 2002 to 2015 were identified. Patients in the ABT cohort were on therapy during SRS and at 1-mo nth follow up. Kaplan Meier method and cumulative incidence model were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and intracranial outcomes. 228 consecutive patients were treated with SRS: 111 with rBM and 117 with AVM. Overall, 51 (22.4%) patients were in the ABT group: 32 (28.8%) in the rBM and 19 (16.2%) in AVM cohorts. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for higher Graded Prognostic Analysis (3–4) in the rBM (ABT: 25.0% vs. non-ABT: 49.0%, p = 0.033) and median age in the AVM (ABT: 51.4 vs. non-ABT: 35.4, p < 0.001) cohorts. In both populations, OS and intracranial efficacy (rBM—local control; AVM—obliteration rates) were statistically similar between the cohorts. ABT was associated with lower 1-year SRN rates in both populations: rBM, 3.1 versus 25.3% (p = 0.003); AVM, 6.7 vs. 14.6% (p = 0.063). On multivariate analysis, ABT was a significant predictive factor for rBM (HR: 0.17; 95% CI 0.03–0.88, p = 0.035), but did not reach statistical significance for AVM (HR: 0.36; 95% CI 0.09–1.52, p = 0.165). ABT use appears to be associated with a reduced risk of SRN following SRS, without detriment to OS or intracranial efficacy. A prospective trial to validate these findings is warranted.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding author. Mudit Chowdhary
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items