Publication

Indications for absorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants: Viewpoint via the Delphi method

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Victoria S Lee, University of IllinoisPrayang Patel, Rutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolDaniel O'Brien, University of AlbertaGeorge A Scangas, Harvard Medical SchoolRaewyn G Campbell, Macquarie UniversityRakesh Chandra, Vanderbilt UniversityGreg E Davis, Proliance Surg Seattle & Puyallup WAJoseph K Han, Eastern Virginia Medical SchoolChristoper H Le, University of ArizonaJivianne Lee, University of California Los AngelesAmber U Luong, Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr HoustonDavid M Poetker, Medical College of WisconsinHassan Ramadan, West Virginia UniversityMichael Setzen, Michael Setzen Otolaryngol PCKristine Smith, University of ManitobaSarah Wise, Emory UniversityJennifer Villwock, University of KansasElisabeth Ference, University of Southern California
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-07-05
Publisher
  • WILEY
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2022 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 12
Issue
  • 10
Start Page
  • 1225
End Page
  • 1231
Abstract
  • Absorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants provide targeted corticosteroid release over a sustained period and are designed to prevent both undesirable adhesion formation and sinus ostia restenosis. Here, we highlight the key evidence of these implants to date and query a group of experts via a Delphi process on the indications and optimal timing for intraoperative or in-office placement of these implants. Six of a total of 12 statements reached consensus and were accepted. Overall, experts largely agree that intraoperative or in-office use of steroid-eluting stents could be considered for patients: (1) who are diabetic or intolerant of oral steroids, (2) undergoing extended frontal sinus surgery, and (3) with recurrent stenosis. Given the lack of expert consensus on other key statements, clinicians should carefully consider these treatment options on a case-by-case basis after shared decision-making.
Author Notes
  • Victoria S. Lee, MD, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, 1855 West Taylor Street, Room 2.42 (MC 648), Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Email: vlee39@uic.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items