Publication

Clinical Trial Design and Development Work Group Within the Quantitative Imaging Network

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Ella F. Jones, University of California San FranciscoJohn M. Buatti, University of IowaHui-Kuo Shu, Emory UniversityRichard L. Wahl, Washington UniversityBrenda F. Kurland, University of PittsburghHannah M. Linden, University of WashingtonDavid A. Mankoff, University of PennsylvaniaDaniel L. Rubin, Stanford UniversityDarrell Tata, National Cancer InstituteRobert J. Nordstrom, National Cancer InstituteLubomir Hadjiyski, University of MichiganMatthias Holdhoff, Johns Hopkins UniversityLawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-06-01
Publisher
  • Grapho Publications
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 6
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • 60
End Page
  • 64
Grant/Funding Information
  • U01CA148131 for HML; U01CA142555, 1U01CA190214, 1U01CA187947, and U01CA242879 for DLR;
  • U01CA179106 and U01CA232931 for LH; P30CA006973 for MH; and U01CA140207 for LHS.
  • U01CA172027 for HKS;
  • U01CA140204 for RLW;
  • U01CA148131 and U01CA140230 for BFK;
  • This work was supported in part by NIH/NCI U01CA151235 and U01CA225427 for EFJ;
  • U01CA140206 for JMB;
Abstract
  • The Clinical Trial Design and Development Working Group within the Quantitative Imaging Network focuses on providing support for the development, validation, and harmonization of quantitative imaging (QI) methods and tools for use in cancer clinical trials. In the past 10 years, the Group has been working in several areas to identify challenges and opportunities in clinical trials involving QI and radiation oncology. The Group has been working with Quantitative Imaging Network members and the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance leadership to develop guidelines for standardizing the reporting of quantitative imaging. As a validation platform, the Group led a multireader study to test a semi-automated positron emission tomography quantification software. Clinical translation of QI tools cannot be possible without a continuing dialogue with clinical users. This article also highlights the outreach activities extended to cooperative groups and other organizations that promote the use of QI tools to support clinical decisions.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Ella F. Jones, PhD Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94115; E-mail: ella.jones@ucsf.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Physics, Radiation
  • Health Sciences, Radiology
  • Engineering, Biomedical
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items