Publication
A combined anatomic and electrophysiologic substrate based approach for sudden cardiac death risk stratification
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/15/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2013-10-01
- Publisher
- Elsevier: 12 months
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2013 Mosby, Inc.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- ISSN
- 0002-8703
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 4
- Start Page
- 744
- End Page
- 752
- Grant/Funding Information
- The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH Award #UL1 RR 025758 and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers).
- This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst
- Dr. Chan was supported by Grant Number K23HL102224 from the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute.
- Dr. Armoundas was supported by a Scientist Development Grant (#0635127N) and by NIA grant 1R21AG035128.
- This work was also supported by a Fellowship and a Science Award from the Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT), the Deane Institute for Integrative Research in Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke and the Cardiovascular Research Society.
- Abstract
- Background Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the primary determinant for sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification, in isolation, LVEF is a sub-optimal risk stratifier. We assessed whether a multi-marker strategy would provide more robust SCD risk stratification than LVEF alone. Methods We collected patient-level data (n = 3355) from 6 studies assessing the prognostic utility of microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) testing. Two thirds of the group was used for derivation (n = 2242) and one-third for validation (n = 1113). The discriminative capacity of the multivariable model was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (c-index). The primary endpoint was SCD at 24 months. Results In the derivation cohort, 59 patients experienced SCD by 24 months. Stepwise selection suggested that a model based on 3 parameters (LVEF, coronary artery disease and MTWA status) provided optimal SCD risk prediction. In the derivation cohort, the c-index of the model was 0.817, which was significantly better than LVEF used as a single variable (0.637, P <.001). In the validation cohort, 36 patients experienced SCD by 24 months. The c-index of the model for predicting the primary endpoint was again significantly better than LVEF alone (0.774 vs 0.671, P =.020). Conclusions A multivariable model based on presence of coronary artery disease, LVEF and MTWA status provides significantly more robust SCD risk prediction than LVEF as a single risk marker. These findings suggest that multi-marker strategies based on different aspects of the electro-anatomic substrate may be capable of improving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment algorithms.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
- CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE
- Science & Technology
- ARRHYTHMIA VULNERABILITY
- LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION
- Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
- EJECTION FRACTION
- T-WAVE ALTERNANS
- PREDICTIVE-VALUE
- Life Sciences & Biomedicine
- NONISCHEMIC DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY
- CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE
- ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
- IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - v0x8r.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-04-04 | Public | Download |