Publication

A combined anatomic and electrophysiologic substrate based approach for sudden cardiac death risk stratification

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Faisal Merchant, Emory UniversityHui Zheng, Massachusetts General HospitalThomas Bigger, Columbia UniversityRichard Steinman, Columbia UniversityTakanori Ikeda, Toho UniversityRoberto F. E. Pedretti, IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore MaugeriJorge A. Salerno-Uriarte, University of InsubriaCatherine Klersy, University of PaviaPaul S. Chan, St Luke's Mid America Heart InstituteCheryl Bartone, Christ HospitalStefan H. Hohnloser, Goethe University FrankfurtJeremy N. Ruskin, Massachusetts General HospitalAntonis A. Armoundas, Massachusetts General Hospital
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-10-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2013 Mosby, Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0002-8703
Volume
  • 166
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • 744
End Page
  • 752
Grant/Funding Information
  • The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH Award #UL1 RR 025758 and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers).
  • This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst
  • Dr. Chan was supported by Grant Number K23HL102224 from the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute.
  • Dr. Armoundas was supported by a Scientist Development Grant (#0635127N) and by NIA grant 1R21AG035128.
  • This work was also supported by a Fellowship and a Science Award from the Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT), the Deane Institute for Integrative Research in Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke and the Cardiovascular Research Society.
Abstract
  • Background Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the primary determinant for sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification, in isolation, LVEF is a sub-optimal risk stratifier. We assessed whether a multi-marker strategy would provide more robust SCD risk stratification than LVEF alone. Methods We collected patient-level data (n = 3355) from 6 studies assessing the prognostic utility of microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) testing. Two thirds of the group was used for derivation (n = 2242) and one-third for validation (n = 1113). The discriminative capacity of the multivariable model was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (c-index). The primary endpoint was SCD at 24 months. Results In the derivation cohort, 59 patients experienced SCD by 24 months. Stepwise selection suggested that a model based on 3 parameters (LVEF, coronary artery disease and MTWA status) provided optimal SCD risk prediction. In the derivation cohort, the c-index of the model was 0.817, which was significantly better than LVEF used as a single variable (0.637, P <.001). In the validation cohort, 36 patients experienced SCD by 24 months. The c-index of the model for predicting the primary endpoint was again significantly better than LVEF alone (0.774 vs 0.671, P =.020). Conclusions A multivariable model based on presence of coronary artery disease, LVEF and MTWA status provides significantly more robust SCD risk prediction than LVEF as a single risk marker. These findings suggest that multi-marker strategies based on different aspects of the electro-anatomic substrate may be capable of improving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment algorithms.
Author Notes
  • Address for correspondence: Antonis A. Armoundas, PhD, Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, aarmoundas@partners.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items