Publication

Mediation of PKM2-dependent glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways by ENO2 in head and neck cancer development

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Lixia Gao, Chongqing University of Arts & SciencesFan Yang, Emory UniversityDianyong Tang, Chongqing University of Arts & SciencesZhigang Xu, Chongqing University of Arts & SciencesYan Tang, Chongqing University of Arts & SciencesDonglin Yang, Chongqing University of Arts & SciencesDeping Sun, Chongqing Medical UniversityZhonghu Chen, Chongqing University of Arts & SciencesYong Teng, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-01-02
Publisher
  • BMC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2022
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 42
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 1
End Page
  • 1
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was also supported in part by Winship Invest$ Team Science Award (to YT).
  • This work was supported by the grant funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203593 (to LG), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing cstc2021jcyj-bsh0239 (to LG), the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN202101326 (to LG).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Enolase 2 (ENO2) is a crucial glycolytic enzyme in cancer metabolic process and acts as a “moonlighting” protein to play various functions in diverse cellular processes unrelated to glycolysis. ENO2 is highly expressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tissues relative to normal tissues; however, its impact and underlying regulatory mechanisms in HNSCC malignancy remain unclear. Methods: Molecular alterations were examined by bioinformatics, qRT-PCR, western blotting, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation, and ChIP-PCR assays. Metabolic changes were assessed by intracellular levels of ATP and glucose. Animal study was used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the ENO inhibitor. Results: ENO2 is required for HNSCC cell proliferation and glycolysis, which, surprisingly, is partially achieved by controlling PKM2 protein stability and its nuclear translocation. Mechanistically, loss of ENO2 expression promotes PKM2 protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and prevents the switch of cytoplasmic PKM2 to the nucleus by inactivating AKT signaling, leading to a blockade in PKM2-mediated glycolytic flux and CCND1-associated cell cycle progression. In addition, treatment with the ENO inhibitor AP-III-a4 significantly induces HNSCC remission in a preclinical mouse model. Conclusion: Our work elucidates the signaling basis underlying ENO2-dependent HNSCC development, providing evidence to establish a novel ENO2-targeted therapy for treating HNSCC.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Pharmacy
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items