Publication

Bioprintability: Physiomechanical and Biological Requirements of Materials for 3D Bioprinting Processes

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Andrea S. Theus, Emory UniversityLiqun Ning, Emory UniversityBoeun Hwang, Emory UniversityCarmen Gil, Emory UniversityShuai Chen, Emory UniversityAllison Wombwell, Emory UniversityRiya Mehta, Emory UniversityVahid Serpooshan, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-10-01
Publisher
  • MDPI
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 by the authors.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 12
Issue
  • 10
Start Page
  • 1
End Page
  • 19
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) grant number R00HL127295 and Emory University School of Medicine, the Pediatric Research Alliance Pilot Grant and the Dean’s Imagine, Innovate and Impact (I3) Research Award.
Abstract
  • Three‐dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an additive manufacturing process that utilizes various biomaterials that either contain or interact with living cells and biological systems with the goal of fabricating functional tissue or organ mimics, which will be referred to as bioinks. These bioinks are typically hydrogel‐based hybrid systems with many specific features and requirements. The characterizing and fine tuning of bioink properties before, during, and after printing are therefore essential in developing reproducible and stable bioprinted constructs. To date, myriad computational methods, mechanical testing, and rheological evaluations have been used to predict, measure, and optimize bioinks properties and their printability, but none are properly standardized. There is a lack of robust universal guidelines in the field for the evaluation and quantification of bioprintability. In this review, we introduced the concept of bioprintability and discussed the significant roles of various physiomechanical and biological processes in bioprinting fidelity. Furthermore, different quantitative and qualitative methodologies used to assess bioprintability will be reviewed, with a focus on the processes related to pre, during, and post printing. Establishing fully characterized, functional bioink solutions would be a big step towards the effective clinical applications of bioprinted products.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Physics, General
  • Engineering, Biomedical

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items