Publication

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Taofeek Owonikoko, Emory UniversityKeunchil Park, Sungkyunkwan UniversityRamaswamy Govindan, Washington UniversityNeal Ready, Duke UniversityMartin Reck, LungClinicSolange Peters, Lausanne University HospitalShaker R Dakhil, Canc Ctr KansasAlejandro Navarro, Vall d'Hebron University HospitalJerónimo Rodriguez-Cid, Med Sur Inst Nacl Enfermedades RespMichael Schenker, Centrul de Oncologie Sf NectarieJong-Seok Lee, Seoul National UniversityVanesa Gutierrez, Hospital Regional Universitario de MálagaIvor Percent, Florida Cancer SpecialistsDaniel Morgensztern, Washington UniversityCarlos H Barrios, Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande Sul PUCRSLaurent Greillier, Aix Marseille UniversitySofia Baka, Interbalkan European Medical CenterMiten Patel, Cancer Specialists of North FloridaWen Hong Lin, Bristol Myers SquibbGiovanni Selvaggi, Bristol Myers SquibbChristine Baudelet, Bristol Myers SquibbJonathan Baden, Bristol Myers SquibbDimple Pandya, Bristol Myers SquibbParul Doshi, Bristol Myers SquibbHye R Kim, Yonsei University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-04-20
Publisher
  • LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 39
Issue
  • 12
Start Page
  • 1349
End Page
  • +
Grant/Funding Information
  • See publication for list of funding groups
Abstract
  • PURPOSE In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. METHODS Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after # 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for # 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested. RESULTS Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P 5 .37; median, 9.2 v 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden $ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%). CONCLUSION Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals.
Author Notes
  • Taofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365-C Clifton Road NE, Room C3080, Atlanta, GA 30322; e-mail: towonik@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items