Publication

Evaluating international Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) results combined with expert opinion: Options for a shorter HJHS

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/23/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Isolde A.R. Kuijlaars, Utrecht UniversityJanjaap van der Net, Universitair Medisch Centrum UtrechtBrian M. Feldman, Hospital for Sick ChildrenMagnus Aspdahl, Karolinska University HospitalMelanie Bladen, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustWypke de Boer, University of AmsterdamRubén Cuesta-Barriuso, European University of MadridRuth E.D. Matlary, Oslo University HospitalSharon M. Funk, University of ColoradoPamela Hilliard, Hospital for Sick ChildrenJudy A. John, Christian Medical College & HospitalChristine Kempton, Emory UniversityPiet de Kleijn, Utrecht UniversityMarilyn Manco-Johnson, University of ColoradoPia Petrini, Karolinska University HospitalPradeep Poonnoose, Christian Medical College & HospitalJean St-Louis, CHU St JustineSylvia Thomas, Federal University of Rio de JaneiroMerel A. Timmer, Utrecht UniversitySonata Saulyte Trakymiene, Vilnius UniversityLeo van Vlimmeren, Radboud University NijmegenKathelijn Fischer, Utrecht University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-10-15
Publisher
  • Wiley
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 26
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 1072
End Page
  • 1080
Grant/Funding Information
  • None declared
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Introduction: The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed to detect early changes in joint health in children and adolescents with haemophilia. The HJHS is considered by some to be too time consuming for clinical use and this may limit broad adoption. Aim: This study was a first step to develop a shorter and/or more convenient version of the HJHS for the measurement of joint function in children and young adults with haemophilia, by combining real-life data and expert opinion. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter secondary analysis on pooled data of published studies using the HJHS (0-124, optimum score 0) in persons with haemophilia A/B aged 4-30 was performed. Least informative items, scoring options and/or joints were identified. An expert group of 19 international multidisciplinary experts evaluated the results and voted on suggestions for adaptations in a structured meeting (consensus set at ≥ 80%). Results: Original data on 499 persons with haemophilia from 7 studies were evaluated. Median age was 15.0 years [range 4.0-29.9], 83.2% had severe haemophilia and 61.5% received prophylaxis. Median (IQR) HJHS total was 6.0 (1.0-17.0). The items 'duration swelling' and 'crepitus' were identified as clinically less informative and appointed as candidates for reduction. Conclusion: Analysis of 499 children and young adults with haemophilia showed that the HJHS is able to discriminate between children and adults and different treatment regimens. Reduction of the items 'duration swelling' and 'crepitus' resulted in the HJHSshort, which had the same discriminative ability. Additional steps are needed to achieve a substantially shorter HJHS assessment.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Isolde A.R. Kuijlaars, Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: i.a.r.kuijlaars-2@umcutrecht.nl
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management
  • Health Sciences, Human Development
  • Health Sciences, Radiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items