Publication

Dialysis facility referral and start of evaluation for kidney transplantation among patients treated with dialysis in the Southeastern United States

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 09/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Rachel Patzer, Emory UniversityLaura McPherson, Emory UniversityZhensheng Wang, Emory UniversityLaura Plantinga, Emory UniversitySudeshna Paul, Emory UniversityMatthew Ellis, Duke UniversityDerek A DuBay, Medical University of South CarolinaJoshua Wolf, Piedmont HealthcareAmber Reeves-Daniel, Wake Forest Medical Center, AtlantaHeather Jones, Vidant Medical CenterCarlos Zayas, Augusta UniversityLaura Mulloy, Augusta UniversityStephen Pastan, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-02-11
Publisher
  • WILEY
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 20
Issue
  • 8
Start Page
  • 2113
End Page
  • 2125
Grant/Funding Information
  • National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: U01MD010611
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Variability in transplant access exists, but barriers to referral and evaluation are underexplored due to lack of national surveillance data. We examined referral for kidney transplantation evaluation and start of the evaluation among 34 857 incident, adult (18-79 years) end-stage kidney disease patients from 690 dialysis facilities in the United States Renal Data System from January 1, 2012 through August 31, 2016, followed through February 2018 and linked data to referral and evaluation data from nine transplant centers in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Multivariable-adjusted competing risk analysis examined each outcome. The median within-facility cumulative percentage of patients referred for kidney transplantation within 1 year of dialysis at the 690 dialysis facilities in Network 6 was 33.7% (interquartile range [IQR]: 25.3%-43.1%). Only 48.3% of referred patients started the transplant evaluation within 6 months of referral. In multivariable analyses, factors associated with referral vs evaluation start among those referred at any time differed. For example, black, non-Hispanic patients had a higher rate of referral (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.27), but lower evaluation start among those referred (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.98), vs white non-Hispanic patients. Barriers to transplant varied by step, and national surveillance data should be collected on early transplant steps to improve transplant access.
Author Notes
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items