Publication

Baseline predictors of central aortic blood pressure: A PEAR substudy

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/22/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Rebecca Rosenwasser, University of FloridaNiren K. Shah, University of FloridaSteven M. Smith, University of Colorado AuroraXuerong Wen, University of FloridaYan Gong, University of FloridaJohn G. Gums, University of FloridaWilmer W. Nichols, University of FloridaArlene B Chapman, Emory UniversityEric Boerwinkle, University of Texas Health Science CenterJulie Johnson, University of FloridaBenjamin Epstein, University of Florida
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-03-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 American Society of Hypertension. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1933-1711
Volume
  • 8
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 152
End Page
  • 158
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work is a substudy of Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR), which was supported by the National Institute of Health Pharmacogenetics Research Network grant U01-GM074492; and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under the award number UL1 TR000064 (University of Florida).
Abstract
  • Elevated central systolic blood pressure (BP) increases the risk of cardiovascular events and appears superior to peripheral BP for long term risk prediction. The objective of this study was to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with central pressures in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. We prospectively examined peripheral BP, central aortic BP, and arterial wall properties and wave reflection in 57 subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension in the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR) Study. Significant predictors of central SBP included height, smoking status, heart rate (HR), and peripheral systolic BP (SBP), while central diastolic BP (DBP) was explained by peripheral DBP and HR. These variables accounted for nearly all of the variability in central SBP and central DBP (R 2 = 0.94 and R 2 = 0.98, respectively). Central pulse pressure variability was largely explained by gender, ex-smoking status, HR, peripheral SBP, and peripheral DBP (R 2 = 0.94). Central augmented pressure had a direct relationship with smoking status, peripheral SBP, and duration of hypertension, whereas it was indirectly related to height, HR, and peripheral DBP. Easily obtainable demographic and clinical factors are associated with central pressures in essential hypertensive persons. These relationships should be considered in future studies to improve assessment of BP to reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items