Publication

A Family Focused Intervention Influences Hippocampal-Prefrontal Connectivity Through Gains in Self-Regulation

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Jamie L. Hanson, University of PittsburghAlysha D. Gillmore, University of PittsburghTianyi Yu, University of GeorgiaChristopher J. Holmes, University of GeorgiaEmily S. Hallowell, University of GeorgiaAllen W. Barton, University of GeorgiaSteven R.H. Beach, University of GeorgiaAdrianna Galvan, University of California Los AngelesJames MacKillop, McMaster UniversityMichael Windle, Emory UniversityEdith Chen, Northwestern UniversityGregory E. Miller, Northwestern UniversityLawrence H. Sweet, University of GeorgiaGene Brody, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-07-01
Publisher
  • Wiley: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 The Authors.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0009-3920
Volume
  • 90
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • 1389
End Page
  • 1401
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grants P30‐DA027827 (to Gene H. Brody).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development. The stressors associated with poverty increase the risks for externalizing psychopathology; however, specific patterns of neurobiology and higher self-regulation may buffer against these effects. This study leveraged a randomized control trial, aimed at increasing self-regulation at ~11 years of age. As adults, these same individuals completed functional MRI scanning (Mage = 24.88 years; intervention n = 44; control n = 49). Functional connectivity between the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex was examined in relation to the intervention, gains in self-regulation, and present-day externalizing symptoms. Increased connectivity between these brain areas was noted in the intervention group compared to controls. Furthermore, individual gains in self-regulation, instilled by the intervention, statistically explained this brain difference. These results begin to connect neurobiological and psychosocial markers of risk and resiliency.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jamie Hanson, Learning Research & Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara Street, Rm. 715, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Electronic mail may be sent to jamie.hanson@pitt.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Cognitive

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items