Publication

The effect of time since measles vaccination and age at first dose on measles vaccine effectiveness - A systematic review

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Stephanie L. Hughes, Public Health OntarioShelly Bolotin, University of TorontoSumaiya Khan, Public Health OntarioYe Li, Public Health OntarioCaitlin Johnson, Public Health OntarioLindsay Friedman, Public Health OntarioAndrea C. Tricco, University of TorontoSusan J. M. Hahne, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the NetherlandsJane M. Heffernan, York UniversityAlya Dabbagh, World Health OrganizationDavid N. Durrheim, University of NewcastleWalter Orenstein, Emory UniversityWilliam J. Moss, Johns Hopkins UniversityMark Jit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineNatasha S. Crowcroft, University of Toronto
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-01-16
Publisher
  • Elsevier Science Ltd.
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 38
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 460
End Page
  • 469
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was supported by the World Health Organization.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: In settings where measles has been eliminated, vaccine-derived immunity may in theory wane more rapidly due to a lack of immune boosting by circulating measles virus. We aimed to assess whether measles vaccine effectiveness (VE) waned over time, and if so, whether differentially in measles-eliminated and measles-endemic settings. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review of studies that reported VE and time since vaccination with measles-containing vaccine (MCV). We extracted information on case definition (clinical symptoms and/or laboratory diagnosis), method of vaccination status ascertainment (medical record or vaccine registry), as well as any biases which may have arisen from cold chain issues and a lack of an age at first dose of MCV. We then used linear regression to evaluate VE as a function of age at first dose of MCV and time since MCV. Results: After screening 14,782 citations, we identified three full-text articles from measles-eliminated settings and 33 articles from measles-endemic settings. In elimination settings, two-dose VE estimates increased as age at first dose of MCV increased and decreased as time since MCV increased; however, the small number of studies available limited interpretation. In measles-endemic settings, one-dose VE increased by 1.5% (95% CI 0.5, 2.5) for every month increase in age at first dose of MCV. We found no evidence of waning VE in endemic settings. Conclusions: The paucity of data from measles-eliminated settings indicates that additional studies and approaches (such as studies using proxies including laboratory correlates of protection) are needed to answer the question of whether VE in measles-eliminated settings wanes. Age at first dose of MCV was the most important factor in determining VE. More VE studies need to be conducted in elimination settings, and standards should be developed for information collected and reported in such studies.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Health Sciences, Pharmacy
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items