Publication

Aiming for a negative fluid balance in patients with acute lung injury and increased intra-abdominal pressure: a pilot study looking at the effects of PAL-treatment

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Colin Cordemans, Campus StuivenbergInneke De laet, Campus StuivenbergNiels Van Regenmortel, Campus StuivenbergKaren Schoonheydt, Campus StuivenbergHilde Dits, Emory UniversityGreg Martin, Emory UniversityWolfgang Huber, Technische Universität MünchenManu LNG Malbrain, Campus Stuivenberg
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2012
Publisher
  • BioMed Central
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2012 Cordemans et al.; licensee Springer
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2110-5820
Volume
  • 2
Issue
  • Suppl 1
Start Page
  • S15
End Page
  • S15
Grant/Funding Information
  • There was no funding for this study.
  • The study is supported by the Council of Internal Medicine (head Prof Dr Pierre Zachée, MD, PhD), ZNA Stuivenberg Hospital, who paid for the open access publication fee.
Abstract
  • Introduction Achievement of a negative fluid balance in patients with capillary leak is associated with improved outcome. We investigated the effects of a multi-modal restrictive fluid strategy aiming for negative fluid balance in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Methods In this retrospective matched case-control study, we included 114 mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with ALI. We compared outcomes between a group of 57 patients receiving PAL-treatment (PAL group) and a matched control group, abstracted from a historical cohort. PAL-treatment combines high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure, small volume resuscitation with hyperoncotic albumin, and fluid removal with furosemide (Lasix®) or ultrafiltration. Effects on extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), organ function, and vasopressor therapy were recorded during 1 week. The primary outcome parameter was 28-day mortality. Results At baseline, no significant intergroup differences were found, except for lower PaO2/FIO2 and increased IAP in the PAL group (174.5 ± 84.5 vs 256.5 ± 152.7, p = 0.001; 10.0 ± 4.2 vs 8.0 ± 3.7 mmHg, p = 0.013, respectively). After 1 week, PAL-treated patients had a greater reduction of EVLWI, IAP, and cumulative fluid balance (-4.2 ± 5.6 vs -1.1 ± 3.7 mL/kg, p = 0.006; -0.4 ± 3.6 vs 1.8 ± 3.8 mmHg, p = 0.007; -1,451 ± 7,761 vs 8,027 ± 5,254 mL, p < 0.001). Repercussions on cardiovascular and renal function were limited. PAL-treated patients required fewer days of intensive care unit admission and days on MV (23.6 ± 15 vs 37.1 ± 19.9 days, p = 0.006; 14.6 ± 10.7 vs 25.5 ± 20.2 days, respectively) and had a lower 28-day mortality (28.1% vs 49.1%, p = 0.034). Conclusion PAL-treatment in patients with ALI is associated with a negative fluid balance, a reduction of EVLWI and IAP, and improved clinical outcomes without compromising organ function.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items