Publication

Interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Felix Götzinger, Saarland UniversityLucas Lauder, Saarland UniversityAndrew SP Sharp, University Hospital of WalesIrene M Lang, Medical University of ViennaStephan Rosenkranz, Cologne University Heart CenterStavros Konstantinides, Johannes Gutenberg University of MainzElazer R Edelman, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMichael Böhm, Saarland UniversityWissam Jaber, Emory UniversityFelix Mahfoud, Saarland University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-05-12
Publisher
  • NATURE PORTFOLIO
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © Springer Nature Limited 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Start Page
  • 1
End Page
  • 15
Abstract
  • Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the leading cause of in-hospital death and the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular death. The clinical presentation of PE is variable, and choosing the appropriate treatment for individual patients can be challenging. Traditionally, treatment of PE has involved a choice of anticoagulation, thrombolysis or surgery; however, a range of percutaneous interventional technologies have been developed that are under investigation in patients with intermediate–high-risk or high-risk PE. These interventional technologies include catheter-directed thrombolysis (with or without ultrasound assistance), aspiration thrombectomy and combinations of the aforementioned principles. These interventional treatment options might lead to a more rapid improvement in right ventricular function and pulmonary and/or systemic haemodynamics in particular patients. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials on the safety and efficacy of these interventions compared with conservative therapies is lacking. In this Review, we discuss the underlying pathophysiology of PE, provide assistance with decision-making on patient selection and critically appraise the available clinical evidence on interventional, catheter-based approaches for PE treatment. Finally, we discuss future perspectives and unmet needs.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items