Publication

Multistate 5-Year Initiative to Improve Care for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Primary Results From the HeartRescue Project.

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/05/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Sean van Diepen, University of AlbertaSaket Girotra, University of IowaBenjamin S. Abella, University of PennsylvaniaLance B. Becker, Hofstra School of MedicineBentley J. Bobrow, University of ArizonaPaul S. Chan, University of Missouri‐KansasCarol Fahrenbruch, Public Health‐Seattle & King CountyChristopher B. Granger, Duke Clinical Research InstituteJames G. Jollis, Duke Clinical Research InstituteBryan McNally, Emory UniversityLindsay White, University of WashingtonDemetris Yannopoulos, University of MinnesotaThomas D. Rea, University of Washington
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-09-22
Publisher
  • Wiley Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2047-9980
Volume
  • 6
Issue
  • 9
Start Page
  • e005716
End Page
  • e005716
Grant/Funding Information
  • The HeartRescue Project was established with funding by the Medtronic Philanthropy.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • BACKGROUND: The HeartRescue Project is a multistate public health initiative focused on establishing statewide out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) systems of care to improve case capture and OHCA care in the community, by emergency medical services (EMS), and at hospital level. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2011 to 2015 in the 5 original HeartRescue states, all adults with EMS-treated OHCA due to a presumed cardiac cause were included. In an adult population of 32.8 million, a total of 64 988 OHCAs-including 10 046 patients with a bystander-witnessed OHCA with a shockable rhythm-were treated by 330 EMS agencies. From 2011 to 2015, the case-capture rate for all-rhythm OHCA increased from an estimated 39.0% (n=6762) to 89.2% (n=16 103; P<0.001 for trend). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 11.4% for all rhythms and 34.0% in the subgroup with bystander-witnessed OHCA with a shockable rhythm. We observed modest temporal increases in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (41.8-43.5%, P<0.001 for trend) and bystander automated external defibrillator application (3.2-5.6%, P<0.001 for trend) in the all-rhythm group, although there were no temporal changes in survival. There were marked all-rhythm survival differences across the 5 states (8.0-16.1%, P<0.001) and across participating EMS agencies (2.7-26.5%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the initial 5 years, the HeartRescue Project developed a population-based OHCA registry and improved statewide case-capture rates and some processes of care, although there were no early temporal changes in survival. The observed survival variation across states and EMS systems presents a future challenge to elucidate the characteristics of high-performing systems with the goal of improving OHCA care and survival.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence to: Sean van Diepen, MD, MSc, 2C2 Cardiology Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Center, University of Alberta Hospital; 8440‐114 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7. E‐mail: sv9@ualberta.ca
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items