Publication

Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/22/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Sukhjinder S. Nijjer, Imperial College LondonSayan Sen, Imperial College LondonRicardo Petraco, Imperial College LondonRajesh Sachdeva, Emory UniversityFlorim Cuculi, John Radcliffe HospitalJavier Escaned, Hospital Clinico San CarlosChristopher Broyd, Imperial College LondonNicolas Foin, Imperial College LondonNearchos Hadjiloizou, Imperial College LondonRodney A. Foale, Imperial College LondonIqbal Malik, Imperial College LondonGhada W. Mikhail, Imperial College LondonAmarjit S. Sethi, Imperial College LondonMahmud Al-Bustami, Imperial College LondonRaffi R. Kaprielian, Imperial College LondonMasood A. Khan, Imperial College LondonChristopher S. Baker, Imperial College LondonMichael F. Bellamy, Imperial College LondonAlun D. Hughes, Imperial College LondonJamil Mayet, Imperial College LondonRajesh K. Kharbanda, John Radcliffe HospitalCarlo Di Mario, Imperial College LondonJustin E. Davies, Imperial College London
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-12-01
Publisher
  • BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 99
Issue
  • 23
Start Page
  • 1740
End Page
  • 1748
Grant/Funding Information
  • SSN (G1100443) and SS (G1000357) are Medical Research Council fellows. RP (FS/11/46/28861), JED (FS/05/006) and Dr Francis (FS 10/038) are British Heart Foundation fellows. The study also received support from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London, UK.
Abstract
  • Objective: To determine whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) can detect improvement in stenosis significance after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and compare this with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and whole cycle Pd/Pa. Design: A prospective observational study was undertaken in elective patients scheduled for PCI with FFR ≤0.80. Intracoronary pressures were measured at rest and during adenosine-mediated vasodilatation, before and after PCI. iFR, Pd/Pa and FFR values were calculated using the validated fully automated algorithms. Setting: Coronary catheter laboratories in two UK centres and one in the USA. Patients: 120 coronary stenoses in 112 patients were assessed. The mean age was 63±10 years, while 84% were male; 39% smokers; 33% with diabetes. Mean diameter stenosis was 68±16% by quantitative coronary angiography. Results: Pre-PCI, mean FFR was 0.66±0.14, mean iFR was 0.75±0.21 and mean Pd/Pa 0.83±0.16. PCI increased all indices significantly (FFR 0.89±0.07, p<0.001; iFR 0.94±0.05, p<0.001; Pd/Pa 0.96±0.04, p<0.001). The change in iFR after intervention (0.20 ±0.21) was similar to ÄFFR 0.22±0.15 (p=0.25). ΔFFR and ΔiFR were significantly larger than resting ΔPd/Pa (0.13±0.16, both p<0.001). Similar incremental changes occurred in patients with a higher prevalence of risk factors for microcirculatory disease such as diabetes and hypertension. Conclusions: iFR and FFR detect the changes in coronary haemodynamics elicited by PCI. FFR and iFR have a signi ficantly larger dynamic range than resting Pd/Pa. iFR might be used to objectively document improvement in coronary haemodynamics following PCI in a similar manner to FFR.
Author Notes
  • Dr Justin E Davies, International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, 59-61 North Wharf Road, London W2 1LA, UK; justin.davies@imperial.ac.uk
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items