Publication

Phthalate Exposure and Breast Cancer Incidence: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Thomas P. Ahern, University of VermontAnne Broe, University of Southern DenmarkTimothy Lash, Emory UniversityDeirdre P. Cronin-Fenton, Aarhus University HospitalSinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen, Aarhus University HospitalPeer M. Christiansen, Aarhus University HospitalBernard F. Cole, University of VermontRulla M. Tamimi, Brigham & Womens HospitalHenrik Toft Sorensen, Aarhus University HospitalPer Damkier, University of Southern Denmark
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-07-20
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 37
Issue
  • 21
Start Page
  • 1800
End Page
  • +
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure Grant No. CCR13264024 (T.P.A.), by funding from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant No. P20 GM103644 (T.P.A.) and R01 CA166825 (T.L.L.).
Abstract
  • PURPOSE Phthalate exposure is ubiquitous and especially high among users of drug products formulated with phthalates. Some phthalates mimic estradiol and may promote breast cancer. Existing epidemiologic studies on this topic are small, mostly not prospective, and have given inconsistent results. We estimated associations between longitudinal phthalate exposures and breast cancer risk in a Danish nationwide cohort, using redeemed prescriptions for phthalate-containing drug products to measure exposure. METHODS We ascertained the phthalate content of drugs marketed in Denmark using an internal Danish Medicines Agency ingredient database. We enrolled a Danish nationwide cohort of 1.12 million women at risk for a first cancer diagnosis on January 1, 2005. By combining drug ingredient data with the Danish National Prescription registry, we characterized annual, cumulative phthalate exposure through redeemed prescriptions. We then fit multivariable Cox regression models to estimate associations between phthalate exposures and incident invasive breast carcinoma according to tumor estrogen receptor status. RESULTS Over 9.99 million woman-years of follow-up, most phthalate exposures were not associated with breast cancer incidence. High-level dibutyl phthalate exposure (≥ 10,000 cumulative mg) was associated with an approximately two-fold increase in the rate of estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer (hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.5), consistent with in vitro evidence for an estrogenic effect of this compound. Lower levels of dibutyl phthalate exposure were not associated with breast cancer incidence. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that women should avoid high-level exposure to dibutyl phthalate, such as through long-term treatment with pharmaceuticals formulated with dibutyl phthalate.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Thomas P. Ahern, PhD, MPH, Department of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, 89 Beaumont Ave, Given D317A, Burlington, VT 05405; e-mail: 02tahern@med.uvm.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Nutrition

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items