Publication

Aggregate Trends of Apolipoprotein E on Cognition in Transgenic Alzheimer's Disease Mice

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/23/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Yassin Watson, Georgia Institute of TechnologyBrenae Nelson, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJamie H Kluesner, Georgia Institute of TechnologyCaroline Tanzy, Georgia Institute of TechnologyShreya Ramesh, Georgia Institute of TechnologyZoey Patel, Georgia Institute of TechnologyKaci Hernandez Kluesner, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAnita Singh, Georgia Institute of TechnologyVibha Murthy, Georgia Institute of TechnologyCassie Mitchell, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-01-01
Publisher
  • IOS PRESS
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 83
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 435
End Page
  • 450
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes typically increase risk of amyloid-β deposition and onset of clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, cognitive assessments in APOE transgenic AD mice have resulted in discord. Objective: Analysis of 31 peer-reviewed AD APOE mouse publications (n=3,045 mice) uncovered aggregate trends between age, APOE genotype, gender, modulatory treatments, and cognition. Methods: T-tests with Bonferroni correction (significance=p<0.002) compared age-normalized Morris water maze (MWM) escape latencies in wild type (WT), APOE2 knock-in (KI2), APOE3 knock-in (KI3), APOE4 knock-in (KI4), and APOE knock-out (KO) mice. Positive treatments (t+) to favorably modulate APOE to improve cognition, negative treatments (t-) to perturb etiology and diminish cognition, and untreated (t0) mice were compared. Machine learning with random forest modeling predicted MWM escape latency performance based on 12 features: mouse genotype (WT, KI2, KI3, KI4, KO), modulatory treatment (t+, t-, t0), mouse age, and mouse gender (male=g_m; female=g_f, mixed gender=g_mi). Results: KI3 mice performed significantly better in MWM, but KI4 and KO performed significantly worse than WT. KI2 performed similarly to WT. KI4 performed significantly worse compared to every other genotype. Positive treatments significantly improved cognition in WT, KI4, and KO compared to untreated. Interestingly, negative treatments in KI4 also significantly improved mean MWM escape latency. Random forest modeling resulted in the following feature importance for predicting superior MWM performance: [KI3, age, g_m, KI4, t0, t+, KO, WT, g_mi, t-, g_f, KI2]=[0.270, 0.094, 0.092, 0.088, 0.077, 0.074, 0.069, 0.061, 0.058, 0.054, 0.038, 0.023]. Conclusion: APOE3, age, and male gender was most important for predicting superior mouse cognitive performance.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Pathology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items