Publication

Brain activity associated with Dual-task performance of Ankle motor control during cognitive challenge

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Sue Peters, University of British ColumbiaJanice J. Eng, University of British ColumbiaTeresa Liu-Ambrose, University of British ColumbiaMichael Borich, Emory UniversityElizabeth Dao, University of British ColumbiaAmeen Amanian, University of British ColumbiaLara A. Boyd, University of British Columbia
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-08-01
Publisher
  • Wiley Open Access
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2162-3279
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 8
Start Page
  • e01349
End Page
  • e01349
Grant/Funding Information
  • Funding for this study was provided by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR; CGA‐91753 PI Boyd).
  • SP was funded by an award from CIHR. MRB was funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation. JE, TLA, and LAB received salary support from the Canada Research Chairs.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • INTRODUCTION: Skilled Ankle motor control is frequently required while performing secondary cognitively demanding tasks such as socializing and avoiding obstacles while walking, termed "Dual tasking." It is likely that Dual-task performance increases demand on the brain, as both motor and cognitive systems require neural resources. The purpose of this study was to use functional MRI to understand which brain regions are involved in resolving Dual-task interference created by requiring high levels of Ankle motor control during a cognitive task. METHODS: Using functional MRI, brain activity was measured in sixteen young adults during performance of visually cued Ankle plantar flexion to a target (Ankle task), a cognitive task (Flanker task), and both tasks simultaneously (Dual task). RESULTS: Dual-task performance did not impact the Ankle task (p = 0.78), but did affect behavior on the Flanker task. Response times for both the congruent and incongruent conditions during the Flanker task were significantly longer (p < 0.001, p = 0.050, respectively), and accuracy for the congruent condition decreased during Dual tasking (p < 0.001). Activity in 3 brain regions was associated with Dual-task Flanker performance. Percent signal change from baseline in Brodmann area (BA) 5, BA6, and the left caudate correlated with performance on the Flanker task during the Dual-task condition (R2  = 0.261, p = 0.04; R2 = -0.258, p = 0.04; R2  = 0.303, p = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of Ankle motor control may be prioritized over a cognitive task during Dual-task performance. Our work advances Dual-task research by elucidating patterns of whole brain activity for Dual tasks that require Ankle motor control during a cognitive task.
Author Notes
  • Lara A. Boyd, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Email: lara.boyd@ubc.ca
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Neuroscience

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items