Publication

Diagnosis and management of pemphigus: Recommendations of an international panel of experts

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Dedee F. Murrell, University of New South WalesSandra Pena, Corporal Michael J Crescenz Veteran Affairs Med CtrPascal Joly, Rouen University HospitalBranka Marinovic, Zagreb UniversityTakashi Hashimoto, Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell BiologyLuis A. Diaz, University of North CarolinaAnimesh A. Sinha, University of BuffaloAimee S. Payne, University of PennsylvaniaMaryam Daneshpazhooh, Tehran University of Medical SciencesRon Feldman, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-03-01
Publisher
  • Mosby-Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 82
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 575
End Page
  • +
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported in part by the Office of Research and Development, Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr Pena’s clinical research is funded by a National Institutes of Health training grant.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background Several European countries recently developed international diagnostic and management guidelines for pemphigus, which have been instrumental in the standardization of pemphigus management. Objective We now present results from a subsequent Delphi consensus to broaden the generalizability of the recommendations. Methods A preliminary survey, based on the European Dermatology Forum and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology guidelines, was sent to a panel of international experts to determine the level of consensus. The results were discussed at the International Bullous Diseases Consensus Group in March 2016 during the annual American Academy of Dermatology conference. Following the meeting, a second survey was sent to more experts to achieve greater international consensus. Results The 39 experts participated in the first round of the Delphi survey, and 54 experts from 21 countries completed the second round. The number of statements in the survey was reduced from 175 topics in Delphi I to 24 topics in Delphi II on the basis of Delphi results and meeting discussion. Limitations Each recommendation represents the majority opinion and therefore may not reflect all possible treatment options available. Conclusions We present here the recommendations resulting from this Delphi process. This international consensus includes intravenous CD20 inhibitors as a first-line therapy option for moderate-to-severe pemphigus.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Dedee F. Murrell, MA, MD, FACD, Department of Dermatology, St. George Hospital, Gray Street, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia. d.murrell@unsw.edu.au
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items