Publication

Survival Analysis of Patients With Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Clinical and DNA Repair Pathway Expression Variables

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Madhusmita Behera, Emory UniversityJohn J. Heine, University of South FloridaGabriel Sica, Emory UniversityErin E. Fowler, University of South FloridaHa Tran, Emory UniversityRobert W. Fu, Emory UniversityAnthony A Gal, Emory UniversityRobert Hermann, WellStar Kennestone HospitalWilliam Mayfield, WellStar Kennestone HospitalFadlo Khuri, Emory UniversityTaofeek K Owonikoko, Emory UniversitySuresh S Ramalingam, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-03-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1525-7304
Volume
  • 14
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • 128
End Page
  • 138
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported by NIH P01 CA166999.
  • GLS, FRK, TKO, and SSR are recipients of the Distinguished Cancer Scholar award from the Georgia Cancer Coalition.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Understanding patient attributes that enhance survival and predict recurrence is necessary to individualize treatment options. Methods: Patients (N = 162) were dichotomized into favorable (n = 101) and unfavorable (n = 61) groups based on survival characteristics. Ku86 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) expression measures were incorporated into the analyses. LR, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression were used to investigate intervariable relationships and survival. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess associations. Results: Sex (OR, 0.32; CI-0.14, 0.76), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (OR, 0.41; CI-0.17, 0.98), and recurrence (OR, 0.04; CI-0.01, 0.20) confer an unfavorable outcome with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) = 0.788. Patients with increased tumor grade (OR = 1.84; CI-1.06, 3.19) or increased Ku86 intensity (OR, 2.03; CI-1.08, 3.82) were more likely to be male individuals, and older patients (OR, 1.70; CI-(1.14, 2.52) were more likely to have SCC. Patients older than the median age (HR, 1.86; CI-1.11, 3.12), patients with SCC (HR, 1.78; CI-1.05, 3.01), patients with recurrence (HR, 4.16; CI-2.37, 7.31), and male patients (HR, 2.03; CI-1.20, 3.43) have a higher hazard. None of the DNA repair measures were associated with significant HRs. Conclusion: Clinical and pathologic factors that enhance and limit survival for patients with stage I NSCLC were quantified. The DNA repair measures showed little association. These findings are important given that certain clinical and pathologic features are related to better long-term survival outcome than others.
Author Notes
  • Address for correspondence: Madhusmita Behera, PhD, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30322, Fax: 404-778-5520; mbehera@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items