Publication

Anti-3-[F-18]FACBC Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography and In-111-Capromab Pendetide Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography-Computerized Tomography for Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    David Schuster, Emory UniversityPeter Nieh, Emory UniversityAshesh Jani, Emory UniversityRianot Amzat, Emory UniversityF Dubois Bowman, Emory UniversityRaghuveer Halkar, Emory UniversityViraj Master, Emory UniversityJonathon Nye, Emory UniversityOluwaseun Odewole, Emory UniversityAdeboye Osunkoya, Emory UniversityBital Savir Baruch, Emory UniversityPooneh Alaei-Taleghani, Emory UniversityMark Goodman, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-05-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: Journal of Urology
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0022-5347
Volume
  • 191
Issue
  • 5
Start Page
  • 1446
End Page
  • 1453
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 5R01CA129356 and the Georgia Cancer Coalition.
Abstract
  • Purpose We prospectively evaluated the amino acid analogue positron emission tomography radiotracer anti-3-[18F]FACBC compared to ProstaScint® (111In-capromab pendetide) single photon emission computerized tomography-computerized tomography to detect recurrent prostate carcinoma. Materials and Methods A total of 93 patients met study inclusion criteria who underwent anti-3-[18F]FACBC positron emission tomography-computerized tomography plus 111In-capromab pendetide single photon emission computerized tomography-computerized tomography for suspected recurrent prostate carcinoma within 90 days. Reference standards were applied by a multidisciplinary board. We calculated diagnostic performance for detecting disease. Results In the 91 of 93 patients with sufficient data for a consensus on the presence or absence of prostate/bed disease anti-3-[ 18F]FACBC had 90.2% sensitivity, 40.0% specificity, 73.6% accuracy, 75.3% positive predictive value and 66.7% negative predictive value compared to 111In-capromab pendetide with 67.2%, 56.7%, 63.7%, 75.9% and 45.9%, respectively. In the 70 of 93 patients with a consensus on the presence or absence of extraprostatic disease anti-3-[18F]FACBC had 55.0% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, 72.9% accuracy, 95.7% positive predictive value and 61.7% negative predictive value compared to 111In-capromab pendetide with 10.0%, 86.7%, 42.9%, 50.0% and 41.9%, respectively. Of 77 index lesions used to prove positivity histological proof was obtained in 74 (96.1%). Anti-3-[18F]FACBC identified 14 more positive prostate bed recurrences (55 vs 41) and 18 more patients with extraprostatic involvement (22 vs 4). Anti-3-[18F]FACBC positron emission tomography-computerized tomography correctly up-staged 18 of 70 cases (25.7%) in which there was a consensus on the presence or absence of extraprostatic involvement. Conclusions Better diagnostic performance was noted for anti-3-[18F]FACBC positron emission tomography-computerized tomography than for 111In-capromab pendetide single photon emission computerized tomography-computerized tomography for prostate carcinoma recurrence. The former method detected significantly more prostatic and extraprostatic disease.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Room E152, 1364 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, Georgia 30322 (telephone: 404-712-4859; FAX: 404-712-4860; dschust@emory.edu).
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Radiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items