Publication

The Perspectives of General Nephrologists Toward Transitions of Care and Management of Failing Kidney Transplants

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Tarek Alhamad, Washington UniversityHaris Murad, Washington UniversityDarshana M Dadhania, Weill Cornel Medicine - New York Presbyterian HospitalMartha Pavlakis, Harvard UniversitySandesh Parajuli, University of WisconsinBeatrice P Concepcion, University of ChicagoNeeraj Singh, Willis Knighton Health System, ShreveportNaoka Murakami, Harvard Medical SchoolMichael J Casey, University of South CarolinaMengmeng Ji, Washington UniversityMichelle Lubetzky, University of Texas AustinEkamol Tantisattamo, University of California, IrvineOmar Alomar, Washington UniversityArman Faravardeh, SHARP Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Center, San DiegoChristopher D Blosser, University of WashingtonArpita Basu, Emory UniversityGaurav Gupta, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityJoel T Adler, University of Texas AustinDeborah Adey, University of California San FranciscoKenneth J Woodside, University of MichiganSong C Ong, University of AlabamaRonald F Parsons, Emory UniversityKrista L Lentine, Saint Louis University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-06-30
Publisher
  • FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 Alhamad, Murad, Dadhania, Pavlakis, Parajuli, Concepcion, Singh, Murakami, Casey, Ji, Lubetzky, Tantisattamo, Alomar, Faravardeh, Blosser, Basu, Gupta, Adler, Adey, Woodside, Ong, Parsons and Lentine.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 36
Start Page
  • 11172
End Page
  • 11172
Abstract
  • The management of failing kidney allograft and transition of care to general nephrologists (GN) remain a complex process. The Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice (KPCOP) Failing Allograft Workgroup designed and distributed a survey to GN between May and September 2021. Participants were invited via mail and email invitations. There were 103 respondents with primarily adult nephrology practices, of whom 41% had an academic affiliation. More than 60% reported listing for a second kidney as the most important concern in caring for patients with a failing allograft, followed by immunosuppression management (46%) and risk of mortality (38%), while resistant anemia was considered less of a concern. For the initial approach to immunosuppression reduction, 60% stop antimetabolites first, and 26% defer to the transplant nephrologist. Communicating with transplant centers about immunosuppression cessation was reported to occur always by 60%, and sometimes by 29%, while 12% reported making the decision independently. Nephrologists with academic appointments communicate with transplant providers more than private nephrologists (74% vs. 49%, p = 0.015). There are heterogeneous approaches to the care of patients with a failing allograft. Efforts to strengthen transitions of care and to develop practical practice guidelines are needed to improve the outcomes of this vulnerable population.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items