Publication

Intestinal microbiome disruption in patients in a long-term acute care hospital: A case for development of microbiome disruption indices to improve infection prevention

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    AL Halpin, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionTJB de Man, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionColleen Kraft, Emory UniversityKA Perry, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAW Chan, Duke UniversityS Lieu, Emory UniversityJeffrey Mikell, Emory UniversityBM Limbago, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionLC McDonald, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-07-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0196-6553
Volume
  • 44
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • 830
End Page
  • 836
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported in part by the Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI050409 awarded to C.K.)
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background Composition and diversity of intestinal microbial communities (microbiota) are generally accepted as a risk factor for poor outcomes; however, we cannot yet use this information to prevent adverse outcomes. Methods Stool was collected from 8 long-term acute care hospital patients experiencing diarrhea and 2 fecal microbiota transplant donors; 16S rDNA V1-V2 hypervariable regions were sequenced. Composition and diversity of each sample were described. Stool was also tested for Clostridium difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Associations between microbiota diversity and demographic and clinical characteristics, including antibiotic use, were analyzed. Results Antibiotic exposure and Charlson Comorbidity Index were inversely correlated with diversity (Spearman = -0.7). Two patients were positive for VRE; both had microbiomes dominated by Enterococcus faecium, accounting for 67%-84% of their microbiome. Conclusions Antibiotic exposure correlated with diversity; however, other environmental and host factors not easily obtainable in a clinical setting are also known to impact the microbiota. Therefore, direct measurement of microbiome disruption by sequencing, rather than reliance on surrogate markers, might be most predictive of adverse outcomes. If and when microbiome characterization becomes a standard diagnostic test, improving our understanding of microbiome dynamics will allow for interpretation of results to improve patient outcomes.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Virology
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items